Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
CinematicStudio
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
I have no idea why anyone would use wordpress. I've used it once in 2019, and still have nightmares.
32.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
Quick comment: ANYTHING is better than wordpress
33.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
I feel you! I'm on Android, and can't believe the morons at google still don't get this! It's insanely slow all the time - I mean, I do have a quad core with 3GB of RAM, it's not top of the top, but still, at this
34.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
Agreed 100%! I've redesigned the UI of my timeline (for a video editor) several times, in order to constantly make it faster. It's painful (for me, that is :D), but I know it's the right thing to do.
35.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
> There used to be a time, in the dark dark ages of history, 10 years ago or so, when I would encounter issues during the course of my work, and I could fairly confidently assume I was doing something wrong, or I just hadn’t read the man
36.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
I agree you need to keep it simple, for sure. But if you don't have a WhatYouSeeIsWhatYouGet editor, you'll need to regenerate your video countless times until you get it right. That's the only issue I have with it - but clea
37.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
I think you wanted to place this in Show HN?
38.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
Agreed 100% - anything in text - you can easily search/index later
39.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
I'm curious why you'd actually want to go through the pain of using a programming language to do this. I think there's a reason why this isn't popular -- video editing is insanely hard if you want something non trivial,
40.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
Social media should be a good thing. The trouble is everyone associates it with Facebook + Instagram (and they both suck). It's really hard for a new player to come into this crowded market, but I'm sure it will happen sometimes i
41.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
As far as I know, a lot of companies offer monthly contracts at a premium. Why not use that until you're comfortable with the Saas product?
42.
▲
I made a PRORES-lookalike for Windows
(cinematicstudio.app)
5 points
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
|
0 comments
43.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
I did take a look. It's a nice tool even though the UI is not the most modern :) Seems the features that it has have already been suggested by others in the thread. Having said that, since I installed it on my desktop, I will take anot
44.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
Just took a look at the multicamera feature. While it's a cool idea, seems it's insanely poorly implemented on Sony Vegas. Here's what I have: you can hover over any video track and I instantly show you what's there. So
45.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
Thanks! I have crop, merge, insert transitions/texts. I will integrate blending. That's pretty much on top of my todo list (after some stability fixes :D) It will take some time, since I will do this as part of a larger module tha
46.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
Agreed! :) It took me a while to finally get that in a lot of places, I don't need to reinvent the wheel, and just see what already works (in UI terms) :)
47.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
anotheryou also pointed me to: https://video.stackexchange.com/questions/14802/can-i-use-ff... I remember looking into this a while ago in quite a bit of detail: https://www.engadget.com/2010-05-04
48.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
> Some features, such as support for some external libraries (libx264 and libx265 for example) and various filters, are covered by the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2 or later (see commercial x264 license exception below). If
49.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
> no, that means you only have to choose a ratio and place your videos in there, but you don't have to commit to a certain resolution or framerate or at least you can change all that later without any effect on video position, scale
50.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
> Yes, but even more: resolution. I don't want to think of whether I need HD or 4k later, I just want to do a cut now. Got it, so if I understand correctly, that means reasonable defaults. > Maybe you can check out what is easy t
51.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
Lol :) By output format, do you mean, .mp4/.avi and the like? If so, clearly on export is where it makes sense (which is where I have it) > I use found-footage a lot and web video comes in formats that make e.g. premiere struggle I
52.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
Thanks! > Since you are aiming at more casual users, consider intuitive intelligent audio controls. Agreed. I have a friend that is pretty much an expert in Logic, and I will ask him for more input. As a side-note, I think the UI will be
53.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
Thanks! > This. Please optimize for casual users and due to Covid-19 social distancing more people are forced to making and editing their own video. Agreed! I've done my best to do just that - but clearly, you will be the judge of t
54.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
Thanks! I may take another stab at it in the future. One of the (many) problems I've had with it is that quite a few mkv files have improper headers (thus, you can't know, for instance, the frame size and/or video length in s
55.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
For some strange reason, I can't hit "Reply" on your other comment, so I replied here: > In my view, there is scope for innovation here by making it easier over how most software applications do this. Agreed! > Here
56.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
Thanks! I would say I have the trimming should be working quite nicely ;) I do it similar to Final Cut. I will take a look at handbrake just to make sure. I assume you mean handbrake.fr, yes? About conversion - right now, I save videos as .
57.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
> However, it's not that a similar thing is unseen elsewhere. If I delete some text from a document, save, and close the application, and in 5 minutes, I want to get it back ... If the user wants to keep the original, they just use
58.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
Thanks! > GUI's. Plain and simple. It's gotta be as absurdly easy to use like iMovie but at least have the basic capabilities of a Sony Vegas Home version (the $30 kind). Agreed! I do hope I've done this, but yeah, you wou
59.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
Thanks! Here's my answer to another user: I do want to go multi-platform ASAP. However, because of the sheer complexity of video editing - and since I focused on speed + ease of use from the get go, I chose to go with a single platform
60.
▲
by
CinematicStudio
6y ago
Thanks! > choosing output format at the start, not just at export Got it, added to my todo list. > file formats and conversion. Maybe auto-conversion could happen in the background while I cut with low-res? I do support the popular fo
More ›