Chukwu

4 ms·

1.
by Chukwu 17y ago
A solemn reminder to shower our friends and family with love while we still have the chance...I am so very sorry for the loss of your friend...my condolences.
2.
by Chukwu 17y ago
Interestingly, the universal answer set of these questions, from all of the women I've seriously dated, would be full! That is, every possible answer would be in the set. And I am certain I am not unique. Indeed, half of the enjoyment in ge
3.
by Chukwu 17y ago
Judging physical attractiveness on dating sites isn't even a partially solved problem - I invite you to name the sites that you have found that are close, as a counterexample. How does one go about making an EDUCATED guess with NO knowledge
4.
by Chukwu 17y ago
Uploading photos isn't what supposedly sets okcupid apart, right? They aren't using physical attractiveness in their matching algorithms and that is the point I was trying to make. Your other point has been addressed above; people don't kno
5.
by Chukwu 17y ago
4. People Know what they want Clearly they don't - otherwise they wouldn't be on okcupid in the first place.
6.
by Chukwu 17y ago
While I love the number crunching ethos, and think these guys are giving it one hell of a go - I will go on the record and say that they will ultimately fail because they are operating under many false premises, a few being: 1. People do no
7.
by Chukwu 17y ago
I've always thought that checkout speeds are negatively correlated with the amount of register localization. By de-localizing the registers, one could map a redistribution that makes the distance from each shopping section equidistant. This
8.
by Chukwu 17y ago
Yes, uniformity is assumed. Difference must be proven. Think for a moment - how could logic work the other way? Given a categorical set of entities, if we could assume prima facie that there were differences in an arbitrary subset of said s
9.
by Chukwu 17y ago
In hindsight, your question is far more stupid than his "idea". It's called the principle of insufficient reason; we aren't to suppose an a priori difference amongst type without proof - so the burden of proof is on the supposer. That you w
10.
by Chukwu 17y ago
Simply - race is a bastardization of many historic cultural sentiments; it has almost no use in relation to human-being; http://www.aaanet.org/stmts/racepp.htm http://www.nature.com/ng/journal/v36/n11s/full/ng1455.html
11.
by Chukwu 17y ago
Stupid and illogical ideas usually do a great job of explaining complex and subtle phenomena - its too bad that they're stupid and illogical. At least have the courage of your convictions and be brave enough in the truth of your pronounceme