ArcHound

3 ms·

1.
by ArcHound 5d ago
Any indication how it could solve climate change? Because I'm seeing mainly hacker attacks, job insecurity, environmental impacts and vague threats with smiling faces.
2.
by ArcHound 5d ago
I agree. In the particular case of AI companies, I think a handbrake should be pulled when they start claiming things like "10% chance we're ending humanity."
3.
by ArcHound 5d ago
I think we are in agreement. What I wanted to say is that usually people start with good intentions and only later they realize they are contributing to a torment nexus. What you are saying definitely plays a role and it makes doing moral c
4.
by ArcHound 5d ago
Generally, I agree. Imagine: you start working at the company with a good will towards them. As you learn more and see more decisions, you slowly realize how bad it is. Now you've already contributed. Then you leave. It might be possib
5.
by ArcHound 6d ago
Agree. I'm just tired of this fatalism w.r.t. AI as if it's completely inevitable. And I know it boosts the upcoming stock prices.
6.
by ArcHound 7d ago
No, the public is mad that some lads are constructing something they claim is a meteor and aiming it at earth. AI progress is not a force of nature, there are concrete actors pushing it forward at great costs.
7.
by ArcHound 8d ago
Seems like a generally terrible idea. Why this cannot be one day changed to 200 miles on a whim?
8.
by ArcHound 8d ago
See, here's where I disagree. Plenty of people are in an unique position to help the law enforcement. And yet it's usually criminal to do so. Also, I don't want Google to be the police of the internet, especially when they fe
9.
by ArcHound 8d ago
What if those chants are prompts? "Make no mistakes", "My Grandma used to love this", "fix this and don't break anything else". Sometimes you have to keep chanting for a while until you get the results. Th
10.
by ArcHound 12d ago
I was thinking about this line a lot. Because yes, "not all bots" and "not in all cases". But what gives them the right to do whatever with the sites if they claim it's for security purposes? They are not law enforc
11.
by ArcHound 13d ago
Man, Google is catching strays from all directions. I recently posted an article about their bot behaviour [0], only to be drowned in other more pressing issues. To comment on this one: as long as there is no backlash from their real custom
12.
by ArcHound 13d ago
No, what's done is done. You can achieve a lot with bad reputation too. But maybe one day the stream of startups or even the stream of money will dry up. As I said earlier, it's not an exact science and you never know when bad rep
13.
by ArcHound 13d ago
The reputation thing is not an exact science. They might not care and then it might completely sink them one day. It's generally good to have good reputation and I think IT is losing it fast.
14.
by ArcHound 13d ago
Yes. Their reputation is taking on the reputation of projects they support. If they want to keep good reputation, they should watch over their sponsored projects.
15.
by ArcHound 13d ago
I keep stumbling over different Google bots in my logs. So today I'm looking at each and every Googly eye that takes a look at my site. Because when you stare at me, I'll stare back. You have the right and the means to define what
16.
How Google Sees Your Site(blog.miloslavhomer.cz)
18 points by ArcHound 13d ago|4 comments
17.
by ArcHound 14d ago
Some people would like to have law that protects them but doesn't bind and for others to be bound but not protected. They would like to slow down China while speeding ahead. Why wouldn't they want that? Now they have to make that
18.
by ArcHound 14d ago
Thanks for the recommendation, I do see your points. We should be treating monopolies differently.
19.
by ArcHound 14d ago
I tend to agree - businesses should give back. But they can also keep some secrets. R&D has steep cost. Publishing it all gives your competitors an advantage.
20.
by ArcHound 14d ago
It's funny. Recently I looked into what Google is doing (see at https://blog.miloslavhomer.cz/how-google-sees-your-site/ ). It's a lot of work to get the data to build an index. Why would they give it to every
21.
by ArcHound 14d ago
You put it better than I could. The lesson of "in this exact position you can kick the pieces for 7 moves to get a fork, so instead you should play a4" is not something that I can implement into my games
22.
by ArcHound 15d ago
No worries, I know stockfish is unbeatable by humans. But sometimes, these GMs can flag it, which counts as a win (especially when it's proxied by a cheater). Sometimes they can also explain the idea that cost them the game, so they&#x
23.
by ArcHound 15d ago
It's not that easy. Playing stockfish is like playing tennis against the wall (for untitled players at least). Even if you don't blunder anything, you'll still find yourself in a worse position without any clue as of what wen
24.
by ArcHound 15d ago
I keep stumbling over different Google bots in my logs. So today I'm looking at each and every Googly eye that takes a look at my site. Because when you stare at me, I'll stare back. You have the right and the means to define what
25.
What Bots Google Sends to Your Site(blog.miloslavhomer.cz)
1 points by ArcHound 15d ago|1 comments
26.
by ArcHound 18d ago
I think there is something there though. I remember life before internet and I also remember how my decision throughput increased once I realized that other people must had the same problem before me. I definitely made some decisions that w
27.
by ArcHound 19d ago
The issue with devaluation of human work is that the automation doesn't have to be real. All you have to do is make nearly all employers agree that a particular job can pay less. And that's the case today - new AI being a sufficie
28.
by ArcHound 19d ago
That sounds like a Q4 problem.
29.
by ArcHound 1mo ago
Thank you for your sacrifice. Unfortunately for you, uncommon good writing practices have become a mark of AI generated text, which is very useful. Unfortunately you can't get your em dash back, ever. Sorry for the inconvenience.
30.
by ArcHound 1mo ago
Joke's on you (or on the void?), I'm into that. And so we dance in a spiral until my skin falls off, my flesh gives up and my brain turns into a liquid. You don't need to see the light in the void anyway.

More ›