Aperocky

8 ms·

151.
by Aperocky 6mo ago
I think both product and engineering is lacking. The only thing that works great today is the LLM model themselves. Everything is dependent on "agents", but there are either barely any scaffold around them or it is full speghetti,
152.
by Aperocky 6mo ago
Not until it's context window and attention is infinite. It's best at summarizing/processing modest amount of information quickly . But given more, its usefulness drastically decreases. This demand toolings that divide the a
153.
by Aperocky 6mo ago
LLM submissions are no different from tech submission of yesterday. But most people used to build tools that does one thing well instead whatever the current meta is.
154.
by Aperocky 6mo ago
Well, the product here has nothing to do with serving GenAI models. It's now application territory. And I prefer unix philosophy vs. the Copilot product approach.
155.
by Aperocky 6mo ago
Off meta: Are we tired of "one single product that solves everything" that every single AI product has became? grep didn't try to also do what awk does, and jq and curl did exactly what they needed to do without wanting to be
156.
by Aperocky 6mo ago
Yeah it was my bad, thanks for pointing it out. For some reason I read that as "able", can't unsee it or understood how it happened.
157.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
There's no refutation of anything here, I seriously thought about the possibility of evolution without meat, but you should be convince me otherwise if you can show me how it can arise naturally after big bang. It's a discussion o
158.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
This is fun to read but any such galactic intelligence would probably recognize that its predecessor were meat, probably kept the original meat safe in a corner of the galaxy too.. The universe were quite uniform in character. Galaxies, sta
159.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
> LLMs are clearly unable to propose new, creative solutions for problems it has never seen before. LLMs are incredibly useful but I'm not sure about this statement. It is proposing stuff that I haven't seen before, but I don
160.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
Also - be careful of automated workflow that uses a single persons credential.. skews this by a lot.
161.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
There haven't been any priors to update so far. All LLMs got better for sure, but they are still definitively LLM and did not show any sign of having purpose. Which also made sense, because their very nature as statistical machines. So
162.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
That's assuming the model is actually as good as they say it is. Given the amount of AI researchers over the past 3 years claiming supernatural capability from the LLM they have built, my bayesian skepticism is through the roof.
163.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
The fix time horizon changes too, don't discard that.
164.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
You can't define a product to be "like a person", there is more variance there than any rational product. I'm purely arguing on technical basis, "person" may fall into either of those camps of philosophy.
165.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
In my opinion cramming invisible subagents are entirely wrong, models suffer information collapse as they will all tend to agree with each other and then produce complete garbage. Good for Anthropic though as that's metered token usage
166.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
I am spoiled by big screen and tmux, I objectively cannot work with small screens any more. I can tolerate chatting with a gateway agent, but that only last for maybe a single hour before I seriously need to vet all of the work that it and
167.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
There is a balance somewhere. I've met some people in my professional life where they shoot down virtually every single idea that come across them. And as a result they were right sometimes, never made a bug, and made the team around t
168.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
on spirit, yes. programmatically speaking, not really. And judging by intention is a slippery slope, and they'll probably end up just banning everyone who are high usage. While some smart orchestration setup will fly under the radar (i
169.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
it's zsh with about 300 lines of zshrc. I know exactly where everything is, and `find` and associated aliases works perfectly when I don't.
170.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
I have no idea what ACP offers that are superior to a tmux session. With tmux, you can attach to it at any time, send keys at any time, and capture pane without bothering any running process inside. And you don't have to get anyone&#x2
171.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
openclaw is too easy to set up and way too messy and context heavy, they don't have to catch you they just have to catch the guy on the market giving out free modified V8 F150s while Anthropic are selling gas subscriptions in town.
172.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
it's trivial to use tmux. But it does feels like openclaw is used (and increasingly developed) by people who never heard of it.
173.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
It is being done, just not here.
174.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
As a mac user for 10+ years that cycled about 7 macs for personal and professional use, I've used Finder about biweekly to click on the airdrop button..
175.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
Environment is part of the package management. As it stand, it's better than npm only because it is in rust.
176.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
It really is about time that somebody do something about it. Start with tokio. Please vend one dependency battery included, and vendor in/internalize everything, thanks.
177.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
The analogous statement is "there should be universal income" and not the amount.
178.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
Yes, they should all be open source.
179.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
It's completely baffling to me why a client that must run on third party environment is behind closed source.
180.
by Aperocky 7mo ago
Exactly, we should be able to build on top of the tooling agents. They are a dime a dozen similar to the models. Power(money) lies with NVDA and people who can best harness this power.

More ›