3 ms·
In my opinion cramming invisible subagents are entirely wrong, models suffer information collapse as they will all tend to agree with each other and then produc
by Aperocky 7mo ago
In my opinion cramming invisible subagents are entirely wrong, models suffer information collapse as they will all tend to agree with each other and then produce complete garbage. Good for Anthropic though as that's metered token usage.
Instead, orchestrate all agents visibly together, even when there is hierarchy. Messages should be auditable and topography can be carefully refined and tuned for the task at hand. Other tools are significantly better at being this layer (e.g. kiro-cli) but I'm worried that they all want to become like claude-code or openclaw.
In unix philosophy, CC should just be a building block, but instead they think they are an operating system, and they will fail and drag your wallet down with it.
- andai 7mo agoIsn't Claude Code supposed to be like a person? What would the Unix equivalent of that be?
- Aperocky 7mo agoYou can't define a product to be "like a person", there is more variance there than any rational product. I'm purely arguing on technical basis, "person" may fall into either of those camps of philosophy.
- gloosx 7mo agoFile. In Unix everything is a file.
- mghackerlady 7mo agohonestly if local LLMs become easier to implement in the future due to dedicated hardware, the Unix-like thing I'm working on might actually get this
- dnaranjo 7mo ago[dead]