Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Ansil849
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
15 ms
·
91.
▲
Ask HN: How to Compete in a Global Remote Work Environment?
6 points
by
Ansil849
4y ago
|
20 comments
92.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
The problem with 'disconnecting' is that you run the very real risk of being fired and replaced by someone who disconnects less than you. Don't want to pickup your phone after hours at 11pm on a Friday? OK, that's your c
93.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
> 1. If you're off the grid, where are you going to get power to run this? There are many sources of off-grid power. Solar, wind, hydro being the big three. > 2. If there's no power grid or internet, you probably have much b
94.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
> Some might argue it doesn't need colors at all. Some might argue it doesn't need letters either.
95.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
I don't think it's a bad thing at all to have another similar zine. For example, I miss the days when it wasn't just 2600, but we also had Blacklisted 411, THUD, etc.
96.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
> That may be true for open access publications, but traditional publishing (with Elsevier or others) is typically free of charge. Yes, and Elsevier has open access journals with APCs (article publishing costs).
97.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
A number of European universities have also cut ties with Elsevier - https://www.enago.com/academy/german-universities-cancel-els... .
98.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
Reminds me of the Amazon data request process from a few weeks ago - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30820424
99.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
> We were looking at "cyber insurance" for our college and found out that we would be disqualified because every network connected device (even those on isolated networks) needs to have 2FA. Well, we have a network connected CN
100.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
> One could argue that such patents are ultimately harmless. On the other hand, it is easy to imagine such a patent being used as a perpetual fundraising machine, with the imprimatur of the USPTO lending credibility to the scam. It is pr
101.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
What do you see as being the apparent misunderstanding?
102.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
I feel like there's some misunderstanding here. I am not at all advocating that the fact that objects had been stolen be suppressed. I'm advocating for the explicit opposite. What I am, however, saying, is that I find it odd that
103.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
> I only visit the museums on the days they're open for free to the public. Right on, I hear ya. If museums want my money, they can break into my house and steal it, like they stole their artefacts.
104.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
> Sound about right? Yup, with the added bit: If you're not claiming that A is like B, then what's the point of you bringing up A to the discussion, at all?
105.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
> if the people it was stolen from decided it wasn't worth preserving who are you to decide they're wrong? Huh? Where did I "decide they're wrong"? In this hypothetical you're concocting, you're sayin
106.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
The "moral crime" (a term the previous poster used, not me) is in knowingly patronizing something that houses stolen goods, not in whether you enjoyed them or not. 'Enjoyment' was just the example the previous poster use
107.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
> Is it a moral crime to simply appreciate a painting, even though it was stolen hundreds of years ago? Yes. Because your enjoyment deprives the ancestors of the people who actually created it. Try personalizing this to see if it resonat
108.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
It's interesting that you refer to the thieves as 'ancestors', but yet refer to those who were stolen from only in terms of "country", which then conveniently allows you to dismiss restitution based on a technicalit
109.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
This reminds me of when Google claimed that the number one was copyrighted [1] [1] https://www.pcmag.com/news/google-drive-flags-text-files-con... I don't recall that the reason for that bug was ever explained. I
110.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
Not committing theft, or returning shit you stole, is considered "woke" now?
111.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
It's a glib fact (and in fact, not even a fact as you by definition cannot assert something that didn't happen as a fact) that detracts from the theft. But sure, yes, if they had not been stolen, certain items may have been destro
112.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
> Just because people are able to acknowledge that specific artifacts only exist because they were stolen, does not mean that they believe the original theft was "right or reasonable." I mean...sure, but then what's the p
113.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
> No one said it "justified" the theft. Nor did I say that anyone said that it "justified" the theft. What I said was that that line of argumentation "sounds like an a posteriori justification for stealing".
114.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
Again... > That sounds like an a posteriori justification for stealing, like saying "see, that building ended up being bombed, so it's a good thing I stole all these Ukrainian paintings from the country last year". The log
115.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
> She was in possession of a looted piece of ancient art. She couldn't keep it. I don't understand. Museums in the West are full of looted ancient art [1]. Why are they allowed to keep it, but this woman cannot keep this one i
116.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
> I'm not sure why people believe they have a right to dictate how someone else's content is created. I do not believe anyone here is at all believing that they have a right to dictate how someone else's content is created
117.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
It is the creator's right to dictate the original presentation, but it is not the creator's right to dictate a user's behavior. Just like it is a filmmaker's right to set the default framerate and playback speed for a fi
118.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
I don't understand why the functionality exists for websites to dictate how users can and cannot view a page in the first place. This is like if you were reading a book that detected if you were trying to use a magnifying glass and imm
119.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
I couldn't readily find any mention of any third-party security audits. Compare that to the numerous audits a VPN like Mullvad has had - https://mullvad.net/en/blog/tag/audits/ .
120.
▲
by
Ansil849
4y ago
Got through the first 10 exercises (out of apparently a total of 35) before becoming bored. I'd rather do the data refining job at Lumen.
More ›