Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Alupis
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
48 ms
·
841.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
You'd be wrong in small claims court. You'd have to go back and sue again for those damages once realized.
842.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Depends how much money. Trespassing you off the property and making you have to go through all of the effort and expenses to win a judgment, only to be unable to collect without more effort and fees, is very unlikely to come out in your fav
843.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
It's also really easy to ask someone to leave your office. Just because you're owed money doesn't mean you can trespass.
844.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
You would have to sue again, in small claims court, for recovery of the fees. The court will not preemptively award estimated collection fees since you have not yet been burdened by them and they are unknown. It's not like a regular ci
845.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
As a counter example, San Diego County Sheriff charges $2500 to levy a vehicle[1] - and I'm certain there's more fees involved since there will be a title involved somewhere, possibly a bank/lienholder, etc. So if you were ow
846.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
That's a really good question... Say the landscaping contractor screws up your yard, and you want a refund of the $2500 you paid. They refuse so you take them to Small Claims. Let's say you win... what happens next? Usually nothin
847.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Enforcement of Small Claims decisions are very often left up to you... and by virtue of being Small Claims, often are not worth the cost to collect anyway.
848.
▲
The Soul of Erlang and Elixir – Talk by Sasa Juric [video]
(youtube.com)
4 points
by
Alupis
2y ago
|
0 comments
849.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Simply winning at Small Claims Court does not guarantee you win money. Often collecting the money is difficult, impossible, or too expensive.
850.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
> really her husband who's a sophisticated investor It's not hard to be a sophisticated investor when your spouse is one of the decision-makers influencing major stock movements - a la CHIPS Act. It would be naïve to believe sp
851.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Anyone could ask you to sign a non-compete. But in California, they have been legally unenforceable for as long as I have been alive. What was changed is they now cannot make condition of employment based on signing this unenforceable contr
852.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
The road towards ARM is very rough for those who do not control the entire ecosystem around the hardware. Microsoft is on their second attempt, and they have much more sway over their ecosystem than Framework ever will. The magic Apple was
853.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Fair enough. Just doing my small part to help promote Gleam. The other post got a lot more traction today - the one directly to Luis' release notes.
854.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
I disagree only slightly. In a more traditional control arrangement, both controls are slaved together to provide immediate feedback on input. With all of the confusion going on in that cockpit at that time, audible warnings likely were not
855.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Again, in the US there are vastly more Boeing aircraft than Airbus. Incidents and Accidents include a huge array of things, including low tire pressure, bird strikes, going off the runway, near misses etc. Many of which have absolutely noth
856.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
So you "quantify" something by presenting made up data? I can do that too. Boeing is 94848% safer - feel better? You are the challenger. Burden of evidence is on you. With that said, clearly this is an unproductive conversation...
857.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Air France 447[1] went down in no small part due to conflicting pilot stick inputs (with neither being aware of the other's actions). As with all aviation tragedies, there never is one single failure, but here the stick control scheme
858.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
I asked you for data, and you provided a ragebait graphic from reddit.
859.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Last I checked, a made-up sensationalist "graphic" from reddit doesn't count as data.
860.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
This graph doesn't say what you think it does. It's more naïve click-bait. An incident is anything abnormal, including low tire pressure or bird strike. The graph uses data from NTSB, a US agency - and the graph shows US data. In
861.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Airlines invest heavily into the ecosystem around their chosen aircraft. They will not switch away from 737's and their excellent track record just because A220 might be moderately slightly improved for a short duration...
862.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Airbus has their share of issues as well. You just haven't cared to read about them. In fact, several Airbus crashes have been a result of their illogical control system, with two disconnected, additive-input joysticks. I don't me
863.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Something about airplanes really brings out the illogical side of otherwise very smart folks. You've heard about a couple Boeing incidents over the past few months - during which millions and millions of miles where traveled in perfect
864.
▲
Gleam v1.3.0 Released
(github.com)
10 points
by
Alupis
2y ago
|
2 comments
865.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
> Yes I do. I would never want to try it though and transitioning to it would be an insanely complex project taking years. I would quit. And there we have it. Some people drink so much Microsoft Kool-Aide and cannot possibly fathom ever
866.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Do you realize all of this can be done without a single drop of Microsoft software? You've rattled off a list of features - mostly related to mailboxes - that do not require Microsoft software to accomplish. Alas, to some people, every
867.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
I'd say, if you are big enough to have a Microsoft Support Contract then you're probably going to pay Microsoft for extended Win10 support anyway. If you're looking to pay for 3rd Party Win10 updates, you might not be running
868.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Except Big Business is exactly the type that does drop the MS Suite. Using Microsoft products becomes a liability on a certain level. It's SMB's that are stuck with MS products... If you think about it, most of us just tolerate Mi
869.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Multiple patch vendors/service contracts is a well accepted thing in the Unix world (Linux, BSD, etc). It works well for those who need/want it. > Guarantee that's going to void your support contract with MS if you have on
870.
▲
Gleam v1.3.0-rc1 Released
(github.com)
4 points
by
Alupis
2y ago
|
0 comments
More ›