Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
Alupis
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
49 ms
·
871.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
And the parent comment has nothing to do with what you stated...
872.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Oh how quickly we've forgotten the Snowden Leaks. They all spy on each other's citizens. When it's not possible to do it directly, they will use covert means a la NSA slurping up data via transit lines, etc. It being an Israe
873.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
> This is very argumentative and shuts down the discourse before it even begins. It's not very in the spirit of HN. There cannot be productive discourse where people advocate forcefully taking things from other people that worked ha
874.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
> For example, if you have a friend who is trying to quit drinking, invite them to fun alcohol-free events. Then your friend goes home and drinks alone...
875.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
How do you propose we stop them? We used to lock these people away until they were cured...
876.
▲
Microsoft waves goodbye to underwater data centers
(windowscentral.com)
3 points
by
Alupis
2y ago
|
1 comments
877.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Right, and personal responsibility has nothing to do with addiction. We should, as a society, normalize impulsiveness and lack of personal responsibility, because people are incapable of being responsible. Look, it's not my fault I ate
878.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
This is counter to my personal experiences - but I'm certain it does depend on location/region.
879.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
By this logic public transportation should be the cleanest of them all. But, it is unfortunately far from that.
880.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Thanks for naming Javalin - I had not previously heard of it and it appears quite nice. I will say though, I vastly prefer pushing configuration out of my code and into config files/text. Things like `Javalin.create { config -> conf
881.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
> The contribution graph would suggest otherwise The contribution graph says precisely what I claimed. > Then what is the selling point of that, if you say crucial features are not closed-sourced and gated behind costly licensing Ea
882.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
You are exposing your JVM ignorance I'm afraid. No, you don't need to pay for performance. The only people paying Oracle are those who choose to. There are many JVM vendors - each with their own secret sauce, pros/cons and ad
883.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
There's dozens of JDK & Class Library implementations. If you use the Oracle one - well, that's on you. Most people don't use the Oracle JDK anymore. And OpenJDK is GPL licensed - and has no strings attached. What you are
884.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
> there is almost no difference with latest versions of Java, and the feature gap closes with every release Java may be implementing features that Kotlin has had since day 1 (or close-to), but Java's syntax will always be what it is
885.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Fair - good thing there's like a dozen web frameworks you can choose from. Find one you like and run with it.
886.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
The problems with C# are many. It's tied to .NET at the hip - there are no 3rd party implementations (Mono is effectively dead, correct me if I'm wrong), it's development is effectively solely driven by Microsoft, and every f
887.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Try Kotlin. It's what modern Java should be, and might eventually slowly (slowly) develop into. It's a joy, and can use the entire JVM ecosystem (frameworks, libraries, tooling, etc). The C# folks can't even knock it... it&
888.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
> essentially starting from a point akin to "fuck the EU, they're laughably ignorable" it's really interesting to read this sentence If you don't have a physical presence within the EU, you can and probably shoul
889.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
> The spite wars continue There are consequences to regulations/legislation. You can't have it both ways. News at 11... The privacy concerns are real, and EU regulations have teeth. No matter how iron-clad Apple's agreemen
890.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
> Many churches primary source of income is donations, which they turn around and spend on private jets, lavish clergy salaries, or even for-profit endeavors like giant shopping malls You're describing maybe a dozen or less mega-chu
891.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
The most likely, and most effective way would be to prohibit US businesses from conducting business with TikTok, it's subsidiaries and affiliates. Similar to economic sanctions. Being removed from US App Marketplaces (Apple, Android, M
892.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Your post seems to be misleading. Both rulings focus on selling goods to non-members, which seems rightfully taxable. This discussion is about taxing churches/religious organizations in general on all revenue/income (ie. tithe, do
893.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
This doesn't work in practice, because of freedom of religion, freedom of assembly, and separation of church and state, ie. constitutionally guaranteed rights. Taxing churches would then be a way for government to suppress and eliminat
894.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Hey, we all received the memo - Musk is evil now. So please, play your part. All jokes aside - having different implementations/ideas competing for similar goals is nothing but good. We cannot pretend to have "min-maxed" spac
895.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
That would only be a "gotcha" if he claimed it was going to be a non-profit all along, then pulled a switch-a-roo a la OpenAI style...
896.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
"Perfect is the enemy of good." You are unwilling to accept a significant reduction in "dinosaur juice" therefore we still burn about as much of it per day today, as we did 20 years ago[1]. You are not alone in this mi
897.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Care to fill us in?
898.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Just think about it. We've had hybrids pushing 50-60+ MPG's for what, over two decades now? Imagine where we'd be if the entire industry leaned into that tech... Instead we pursued an entirely unproven technology that require
899.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
You are too easy to troll...
900.
▲
by
Alupis
2y ago
Posting this demonstrates a clear lack of understanding of how the US government works - and a gross misunderstanding of the founding of the US and the framer's intentions. The "And?" was a prompt for the poster to elaborate
More ›