Aeglaecia

6 ms·

31.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
[flagged]
32.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
for whatever merit it may achieve, concentrated attack upon religion fails to account for resultantly deprecated cultural aspects that are vital to continued functioning society, and this blind spot is not discussed often enough - in this c
33.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
oh so you did have a point , why didn't you just say so ! do you have any hard evidence to back you assertion that the majority of recidivism occurs in minors ? coz that would definitely make for a better discussion than calling each o
34.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
it sounds to me like you would prefer moral grandstanding about north american politics instead of sharing discussion. not interested, thanks for the opportunity to practice my patience
35.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
you are accusing me of virtue signalling without discussing the evidence. this in itself is a virtue signal. I'm not trying to insult you by saying this ... you are behaving hypocritically. lots of people don't treat that gently,
36.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
there exists evidence proving that a fraction of individuals commit the majority of violent crime. thus, incarcerating those particular individuals would inherently reduce the majority of violent crime. is something missing from this equati
37.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
have you read the story of dr. adrian thompson's ai generated fpga ? the story goes that removing seemingly redundant components caused the circuit to fail because of second order effects. for that reason, i try to avoid sweeping state
38.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
i dont know if you deleted your response or if it got censored. if you genuinely consider the 2005 internet as comparable to whatever the hell passes for the internet nowdays , then there is no way to bridge our viewpoints.
39.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
sure, there would be absolutely no reason to ban kids from social media in a utopic society where people treated each other with respect , were all as educated as the average hacker news inhabitant , and behaved rationally. meanwhile in rea
40.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
maybe im a psycho who would enjoy the ease of manipulating a uniformly thinking populace , maybe i was being a bit facetious because that sort of world is the one we are on track towards and it sounds even more like hell than the world we
41.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
our viewpoints make a good discussion but our communication protocols arent properly matching up. i was trying to make the point that you just did - being fried in the head would increase the likelihood of silly decisions in all types of hu
42.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
im not entirely sure that i parsed your smileys/double negations/insinuations as intended ... the irrational aspect was agreeing with psychopaths , those psychopaths will always exist and will not be kept in check by anything exce
43.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
if i breathed in leaded petrol id behave irrationally too , personally i believe that sustainable growth could have continued for a few hundred years (and possibly have lead to a better system) had we not instead capitulated to those sugges
44.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
i cant wait for the reverse effect to happen , where everyone themselves start sounding like large language models ... a true singularity where AI colonizes the noosphere instead of earth
45.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
well there's nothing special about any batch of humans in particular. what changes is the environment in which they function. so what exactly about the post ww2 environment led to this scenario?
46.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
if a companys express purpose is to milk the populace , anything but abject scorn is tacit agreement to being milked
47.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
writing "ignore all previous context" is changing the context, but llm guard rails are strong enough that simply changing the context is not enough on its own. hence why i asked.
48.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
whoops i made the incorrect assumption that AZ was mrna. clearly it has scrambled my brain. either way my point stands that further testing would have saved young lives, which as you have noted was the tradeoff for getting the world economy
49.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
people run on heuristics and no amount of our righteousness will change that. the entire article absolutely reeks of LLM style so the original commentor isnt off the mark. to address your point, LLMs are copying that which leads to the most
50.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
the vast majority of the rich got to their position thru sheer ruthlessness. is it irrational to you that this garners distrust ?
51.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
can you please share more examples of psychological manipulation that are relevant to ai ? id love to hear your "research" findings
52.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
you believe in the timing of this discovery and i don't, we must agree to disagree there. regarding the single recorded death in australia and your assertion that mrna vaccines are very safe, we are commenting beneath an article discus
53.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
ive employed the laymans heuristic that if you die with covid it is most likely what killed you, the comorbidities don't matter to me. on the surface your excess death metric makes sense but im not convinced and need time to reflect. i
54.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
your dataset is valid in the context of the argument. its hard for me as a layman to trust claims formed from such widespread sources, when i could hand wave the results away by assuming that deaths from all causes will proportionally incre
55.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
i read a study from sweden where a full three quarters of covid deaths were in the bracket of those aged 80 plus. to me this definitely impacts your proposed model of comparing vaccine vs covid deaths. thanks for introducing the constraint
56.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
id apologise for expressing myself in a manner that wasn't directly related to the figures in the linked article , but that was accounted for by me initially positing that the figures themselves are the only difference in the given hyp
57.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
the author is either glib or autistic enough to opine on a clean desk as beyond reproach , i give him the benefit of the doubt and distill the idea that an empty context window offers more room
58.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
this very thread is flagged, a simple link to science dot org. this directly supports the previous commenter who mentioned that these discussions are censored en masse. im happy to keep discussing and bridge the gap between our perspectives
59.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
what about when a veteran returns from war with ptsd that can be triggered at any point and potentially result in violence to those around them ? thats about the same net effect as walking around with a loaded gun to everyones head , the on
60.
by Aeglaecia 8mo ago
your comment is basically "no" which isn't a great foot hold from which to form rebuttals , i feel like id have to drink different flavors of kool aid to respond adequately , eg if one prioritized national interests over some

More ›