ABeeSea

34 ms·

331.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
What did the government do here?
332.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
Rep Swalwell (member of intelligence and judiciary committees) said on msnbc today that several republicans lawmakers told him they would vote no because they feared for their and their family’s safety. The Republican Party is afraid that T
333.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
Is that just a press release? Trump is free to do as many of those as he wants.
334.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
Because the CEO went on TV and said so.
335.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
According to the law subreddit, Parler’s current legal representation for this suit consists of a single lawyer running a sole proprietorship. They are going to get buried in this case.
336.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
Did you read the article or the lawsuit? They make zero free speech claims in the lawsuit. They are making a Sherman anti-trust argument that Twitter and Amazon are colluding because Twitter is scared of competition from Parler. This lawsui
337.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
He was arrested in December 2015 and his trial started in June 2017. After appeals, he wasn’t sentenced until March 2018. Not exactly a speedy process.
338.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
The wheels of justice move slow. The timelines of their cases aren’t that different and Holmes’s case is both clear-cut and amazingly complex. Aaron was arrested in Jan 2011 and died Jan 2013 before his trial started and after being offered
339.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
I’d call 2 and 3 data engineers and 1 either a data analyst or BI developer/engineer depending on technical proficiency.
340.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
I disagree since political opinions aren’t a well-defined class or even an idea. At least with religion you can restrict it to religion federally recognized by the IRS. With political opinions, literally every conceivable declarative statem
341.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
I don’t see a contradiction here. The point of classical liberalism is well-regulated capitalism. Economic freedom combined with a rule of law to protect the citizenry. You can want to regulate Twitter and believe they have the freedom to k
342.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
Both pricing and start-up times are significantly better in Glue 2.0 (assuming one can migrate). But even on Glue 1.0, orchestrating an ETL process with with several dozen jobs is a non-trivial amount of configuration and labor. (Jobs failu
343.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
In AWS, lambda’s and step functions. https://aws.amazon.com/step-functions/
344.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
They also signed a multi-year deal with Pinterest which is a competitor to twitter. So that argument won’t get very far.
345.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
If you sign a long-term contract, sure. For example, Pinterest just signed a multi-year $750M contract with AWS. If AWS kicked them off, there would be repercussion for breach of contract. But just signing up for AWS’s generic TOS’s with a
346.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
Plus AWS does actually make their own power. The own and/or fund wind and solar farms across the globe. They also run their own fiber and are part of undersea cable consortiums.
347.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
Citizens United gave corporations constitutional rights (specifically the first amendment). Which means they have freedom of association. The only way to stop AWS from dropping Parler would be if the government forced AWS to host Parler whi
348.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
The 1st amendment gives all of the companies the freedom of association. They can deny doing business for any reason except for protected class. Are you trying to force companies to do business with entities that they do not wish to do busi
349.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
More like “whose letters to the editor page routinely featured calls for violent revolution.”
350.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
I think learning Scala is a bit of a waste of time, but I don’t know everyone’s stack. Maybe it’s a west coast bubble, but serverless seems to be the most popular choice for new ETL stacks even if the rest the cloud tech stack isn’t serverl
351.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
Attacking cops to get past the barricade around the building certainly is.
352.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
We were discussing the infiltration of white supremacists in law enforcement. Not sure what your question is getting at in regard to that discussion.
353.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
That’s not what your article says lol. Do you have another source for your outlandish claim?
354.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
Is the right-wing not against white supremacy?
355.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
Are you saying white supremacy is just another political ideology in the marketplace of ideas? Because I don’t believe that. White supremacists must be removed from all law agencies. And they are usually pretty public about their white sup
356.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
Yea, the President and r Senators fomenting insurrection and someone no one has heard of writing an opinion piece are exactly the same.
357.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
Do you have a source for “millions of people”?
358.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
> The suggested department would consist of peace officers So there would still be officers, but the department would be rebuilt from the ground up. Sounds like a great idea. Some departments can’t be fixed and have to be rebuilt.
359.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
What newspaper or website was that article on the “front page” of? The “code switch” podcast on NPR isn’t front page of anything.
360.
by ABeeSea 6y ago
The sidebar covers the content when zooming. Terrible design for accessibility.

More ›