ABCLAW

13 ms·

91.
by ABCLAW 4y ago
>So, taxation is either extortion, robbery or theft If ultimate enforcement through violence is the only determinant of whether or not something is a crime, then the very laws that dissuade other crime, say the robbery or theft that you
92.
by ABCLAW 4y ago
>I am a socialist where governments are efficient, liberatarian where governments are dysfunctional. At first glance this position seems reasonable, but ultimately it's short sighted - the game is iterative. Penalizing the public co
93.
by ABCLAW 4y ago
>A substantial part of your rent is property taxes. Here. Without determining elasticity, it's impossible to determine how much of that cost is flowing through or how much goes to impact margin.
94.
by ABCLAW 4y ago
If you're a "high earner" there are a panoply of services that allow you to structure your income, wealth appreciation, or other forms of wealth generation in tax-optimized vehicles. The tax universes at 200k/yr and 500k
95.
by ABCLAW 4y ago
>this current social media centered around outrage, fear, anger and rage Whenever I see takes like this, I wonder what platforms people are using and how they're using them. I interact with my family on facebook, read some stuff on
96.
by ABCLAW 4y ago
There are plenty of unmoderated corners of the internet; always have been, always will be. They were fun when the internet started out and when the financial incentive to spam the everloving shit out of them was low, but that's not rea
97.
by ABCLAW 4y ago
Not really. The OP in this thread is very overblown. The business judgement rule is a cornerstone of corporate law in most western jurisdictions - Delaware's framework, if anything, enhances the value of the scope and level of deferenc
98.
by ABCLAW 4y ago
I don't agree with you at all, for the reasons I've set out. If you stopped reading after hearing that super priorities exist, and believed that their existence was proof that labour regularly defrauds capital, you'd have ver
99.
by ABCLAW 4y ago
>Your summary is simply not what took place above. You seem dead set on doing anything other than actually engaging with the substance of the post. I didn't say the term 'you' wasn't used. I said the argument has no
100.
by ABCLAW 4y ago
I don't want to assume, but I'm curious if you read the documents I linked. Your reply doesn't seem to address contradictory data I've provided. To address your second point; If Walmart was consistently discussed negativ
101.
by ABCLAW 4y ago
You are mistaken, the analysis derives out of one of the core elements of firm theory. It doesn't assume a zero-sum situation at all. There's a lot of literature on 'the analysis', which happens to not be mine. It's
102.
by ABCLAW 4y ago
>No, the poster I'm replying to is obsessively making guesses about who I am as a person The poster you're replying to has provided a synopsis of his argument; it has nothing to do with you. Part of the site's rules are th
103.
by ABCLAW 4y ago
Your reply elsewhere saying that unions are full of nepotism etc is a portrayal. A distributed portrayal is still a portrayal. That said, it begs the question, why is the 'grass roots' discourse so consistently negative in America
104.
by ABCLAW 4y ago
>If your points are worth making should be able to make them without these ad-hominem guessing games. >Your rhetoric is disgusting and regrettable This you? Feels like a bit of 'projection'. The poster you're replying t
105.
by ABCLAW 4y ago
One of the key evolutionary characteristics of firms is that they must self-appropriate more value in their network of transactions than they dispense. Their engagement with labour is no different; if they paid labour more than the value th
106.
by ABCLAW 5y ago
I've had plenty of professional and academic exams with multiple different versions of the exam with the questions scrambled. I think almost all of my Bachelor level science courses were provided in that way, as well as multiple Bar ex
107.
by ABCLAW 5y ago
>The question was whether the lack of a feature that can be disabled is a feature, which it isn't. It is, though, and examples have been provided of VERY successful platforms built upon this negative space. Consider the lack of a fe
108.
by ABCLAW 5y ago
>because of a logically tenuous action against their assets Generally speaking, in order to get intrusive injunctive relief of this level, you need to have a VERY good record. Without the ability to freeze assets, someone can defraud you
109.
by ABCLAW 5y ago
Agreed. When I was doing science, we had a weekly lab meeting where one of our lab members would pick a piece of published literature in our field and break down how bullshit it was. It's hard to do good science.
110.
by ABCLAW 5y ago
The harm here refers to whether or not there's a need for interim injunctions to prevent the liquidation or concealment of assets in order to avoid being solvent at the time of judgement. My comment doesn't state anything about as
111.
by ABCLAW 5y ago
>And over a year later, no criminal case has been filed Just so people know, this is a blip of time in the legal world; financial fraud takes time to document. People need to go in, recover all of the relevant ESI, categorize it, then pr
112.
by ABCLAW 5y ago
>But it should still be allowed to question the solutions people claim to have to those problems. Why should we be having social discussions about whether or not genocide against a particular out-group is acceptable? Would the propositio
113.
by ABCLAW 5y ago
Violence becomes inevitable... because people are can't call black people subhuman in public without being censured? That's one hell of a take.
114.
by ABCLAW 5y ago
Just as an FYI to casual readers, I'd take the above post with a large dose of skepticism. If I'd wager a guess, the research in question was performed during Google v. Oracle winding it's way through the courts, because for
115.
by ABCLAW 5y ago
>Dollar stores very often aren’t cheaper than other sources for similar products especially for grocery items (which they tend to have very limited selections of.) This isn't true for many of the core staple items sold by traditiona
116.
by ABCLAW 5y ago
>Anybody who disagrees is a dirty, alt-right mis-informed trump fucker. Right? Not at all, but that doesn't mean everyone who disagrees is discussing the matter in a civil manner. I've only posted to bring attention to a flaw i
117.
by ABCLAW 5y ago
>Damn right I’m emotional. Y’all are gaslighting me and trying to bully my daughter into wearing a mask at school. No one is gaslighting you, nor is asking you to discuss things in a civil manner 'abuse'. If you assume everyone
118.
by ABCLAW 5y ago
>Where is your data that they don’t have long term developmental effects from wearing masks and missing facial cues? Eh? Asking someone to prove a negative when they indicate there is no positive evidence pointing towards the assertion y
119.
by ABCLAW 5y ago
>"nice business you've got there, shame if someone were to publish a hit piece in a major media outlet." I might be misreading this, but are you implying that a subset of journalists perform investigative journalism to eng
120.
by ABCLAW 5y ago
A McDonald's wage isn't going to pay for representation, so you better hope there's easy evidence to be had that what's happening to you is a policy-level scheme to defraud employees so you can attempt a class action. Th

More ›