>But it should still be allowed to question the solutions people claim to have to those problems. Why should we be having social discussions about whether or n

>But it should still be allowed to question the solutions people claim to have to those problems. Why should we be having social discussions about whether or not genocide against a particular out-group is acceptable? Would the proposition that slaughtering an out-group be a good faith discourse about the best path forward for society? If not, why should we have that discussion at the cost of other discussions?