8372049

10 ms·

91.
by 8372049 2y ago
In this specific case I asked ChatGPT, which said "Walter Bright is the creator of the D programming language. He's a talented programmer!", so maybe he specifically won't be forgotten. Most of the rest of us probably wi
92.
by 8372049 2y ago
> What specific law is being broken? This has been pointed out multiple times now. I'll repeat it once more: "The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies
93.
by 8372049 2y ago
No, but completely eliminating Israel isn't (and shouldn't be an option), so hopefully 1967 borders is where it can end. Israel returns occupied territories, Palestine/Hamas stops wanting revenge for everything Israel has don
94.
by 8372049 2y ago
First of all, "In cases not covered by this Protocol or by other international agreements, civilians and combatants remain under the protection and authority of the principles of international law derived from established custom, from
95.
by 8372049 2y ago
That is the same as a transfer under IHL.
96.
by 8372049 2y ago
> The Israeli government did not and does not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies. The citizens move there of their own accord That is the same as a transfer under IHL.
97.
by 8372049 2y ago
Well, they could start by giving up the illegally occupied parts of Palestine.
98.
by 8372049 2y ago
Not sure what GP is on about. Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention is very clear on this matter: "The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies."
99.
by 8372049 2y ago
If you have looked then you can't have tried very hard: "The Occupying Power shall not deport or transfer parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies." Fourth Geneva Convention, Article 49, last para
100.
by 8372049 2y ago
> There is no world where combatants can expect to be allowed to enjoy the protections civilians are afforded while still killing you. That is true, but this does not take away the protection afforded to civilians. As a concrete example,
101.
by 8372049 2y ago
If Israeli courts give clearance to conduct that violates IHL, then that is certainly an unwillingness to enforce said laws.
102.
by 8372049 2y ago
> For a nation state the most useful thing would be a "kill bit" where you can broadcast some signal or key and disable all your enemy's computers. CNE is generally considered to be far more valuable than CNA. First of all
103.
by 8372049 2y ago
> not entirely positive I don't know if he was responsible, but null-terminated strings has got to be one of the worst mistakes in computer history. That said, how is the significance of C and Unix "overblown"? I agree Job
104.
by 8372049 2y ago
> and privacy What could possibly go wrong with demanding "encryption backdoors" in everything...
105.
by 8372049 2y ago
I think GP's point wasn't whether or not Australia should count (I agree that it should), but that the level between "the bad" (the US, Hungary, parts of former Yugoslavia, parts of Eastern Europe etc.) and "the goo
106.
by 8372049 2y ago
Thanks for elaborating! I'm a retired grunt and tech is just a hobby for me. I host my own Gitea with the same challenges, but to me looking up cron patterns etc. is the norm, not the exception, so I don't think much about it.
107.
by 8372049 2y ago
Someone far more deserving of the title, Dennis Ritchie, died a week after Jobs' stupidity caught up with him. So much attention to Jobs who didn't really deserve it, and so little to Dennis Ritchie who made such a profound impact
108.
by 8372049 2y ago
Mobile era of computing would have happened just as much if Jobs had never lived.
109.
by 8372049 2y ago
You're even using a and b, very good.
110.
by 8372049 2y ago
GDPR got that covered, now it just needs to become global, and enforced.
111.
by 8372049 2y ago
Disord's TOS used to say "we may sell all your convos, including your private ones". Then some time later, they suddenly they changed it to noooo, we would never sell aaanything, and didn't even update the "last cha
112.
by 8372049 2y ago
Why do you think it's a pain to host the Gitea?
113.
by 8372049 2y ago
> Likely they are just filtering out all data produced in the EEA. Likely they are just hoping to not get caught and/or consider it cost of doing business. GDPR has truly shown us (as if we didn't already know) that compliance
114.
by 8372049 2y ago
"If you can read assembly, all programs are open source." Sure, it's easier and less effort if the program is actually open source, but it's absolutely still possible to verify on bytecode, decompiled or disassembled pro
115.
by 8372049 2y ago
Did you read the (entire) article?
116.
by 8372049 2y ago
It's funny how these tiny islands have played roles in military history. Saint Helena is famous for Napoleon's exile and death. Both SH and Ascension were important uboat staging bases during WW2, and RAF Ascension Island was an i
117.
by 8372049 2y ago
> But the RA are used primarily in the later phases of the approach. Indeed, the context of my sentence was using it for ground avoidance. > General aviation aircraft are quite frequently well-equipped with instrumentation for IFR ops
118.
by 8372049 2y ago
Just to add for completeness, for ICAO/the rest of the world: Transition altitude (ascent) and transition level (descent) is typically defined per FIR (flight information region), but can be airport-dependent. It is listed in the relev
119.
by 8372049 2y ago
To expand on verst's answer, the altimeter setting is defined based on your location, to roughly match meteorological conditions. When flying IFR or otherwise directed by ATC, you will be given altimeter settings. They will also be rep
120.
by 8372049 2y ago
I haven't read the tutorial (yet), but I know a bit about autopilots. Autopilots depend a lot on which kind of plane it is in, but for the most part, autopilots aren't really "auto pilots". They consist of various fairly

More ›