70seconds

5 ms·

1.
by 70seconds 11y ago
I hate it when people call these dumb loose pages a book. Just like cotton in a bag isn't a comforter, a website with itsy-bitsy manuscript is not a fucking book. So ... > Poking fun? Not at all.
2.
by 70seconds 11y ago
Another metaphor for the fear of retribution: Everything on that article is hyperlinked properly except for the tweet from Snowden. Although I do give WP some credit for their original stories on surveillance by NSA/other agencies.
3.
by 70seconds 11y ago
> "Want to read everything"? How is NSA wanting to read everything (if they don't already) any different from Chinese authorities reading everything? Different my foot. Looking at the quality of discussion here it seems we
4.
by 70seconds 11y ago
Oh, I forgot to mention the NSA did I? Or let us talk about it's "fundamentally different" because it is always China behind all the wrongdoings against the Internet, my friends. But wait, keep the mechanics/micro aside.
5.
by 70seconds 11y ago
Trust me CNN, it is hardly different from how we wage a war on the Internet (CISA, CISPA, TPP and what not). Do you not use that ton of cruft on your site with similar designs?
6.
by 70seconds 11y ago
I'm pretty sure I saw them around in 2011 so I don't understand why report wrong age of the company here? Note they did a seed round of $3 million in 2012.
7.
by 70seconds 11y ago
It took over a minute on mine; but I'm sure they're hammered right now.
8.
by 70seconds 11y ago
70 seconds to load a chapter? That's a terrible benchmark for even for some of the heaviest websites out there! This may not be a popular opinion but I (and many ordinary readers like me) see that link as a website. Not a book. It feel