Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
627467
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
27 ms
·
421.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
If your read the article I linked above and countless adjacent ones you'll see a subtext of blaming "unfair State support" (ie. Pentagon/USG) for SpaceX success. Before spaceX, the target was Boeing. Ultimately it is rea
422.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
Whenever I read anything about rocketry and Europe I'm reminded of this quote: > Let us say we had ten guaranteed launches per year in Europe and we had a rocket which we can use ten times—we would build exactly one rocket per year,
423.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
hey: I want to be tracked and I'm extremely annoyed that the law forces me to consent on every f- site I go to. Seems fairly clear that I consent when my browser makes a request to someone elses server and I have js enabled. If you don
424.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
> Companies could easily avoid any cookie banner. Just don’t track. Companies can easily not deal with EU shenanigans. Just leave the EU. actually: many do.
425.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
Airbus has other types of disfuntions. It's ridiculous to consider the problems with Boeing started now: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_737_MAX_groundings https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki&#x
426.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
Does it matter? At this stage it's just ridiculous that there's no more uproar towards Boeing or even direct intervention into it. Maybe because it's one of the 2 disfuntional members of the duopoly at the foundation of globa
427.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
Maybe what most people are truly concerned is the Boeing Narrative? Increasingly more than just a narrative
428.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
"major banks 2008: too big to fail" "Boeing: too big to be grounded"
429.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
> Deontology vs Consequentialism How deontologists learn to change their mind (adapt to change) if they prevent themselves from experiment to see the consequences?
430.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
> occasional Well, it would be occasional for you to ask questions to your doctor, but your doctor wouldn't be just occasionally answering questions from their patients > Non-urgent questions Imagine everyone sending non-urgent q
431.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
There are so many possible perspectives for such story but in this day and age the focus is on how much this cost. So let's talk about cost: I don't know how often he sleeps in this way[0] but clearly at £8500/year no one is
432.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
I do not recall any example of Apple overtly listening to customers unless pressed by class action. That's the irony of this feedback post. Apple is just not an org that takes direct customer feedback (like you've noticed from the
433.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
> They employ a distinct brand of gaslighting and blaming-the-user that I have come to associate solely with them. > Curiously this limitation wasn’t enough to make me return the device, despite it being part of my justification for i
434.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
Hey, I love to bash appl like anybody else, and this notch issue is an equivalent dumb outcome as the magic mouse charging like a dead cockroach or the "you're holding the phone wrong". But my main concern is how EVERY Mac ap
435.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
Actually: wouldn't it be great if most people thought we actually have a level of responsibility for other for the rest of our lives?
436.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
Please think about it before judging other people's judgement. People have opinions, its fine. [edit] benefits of having kids: you stop taking yourself so seriously like being oversensitive about other people's opinions
437.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
Makes sense. Why lock-in into ATH prices if you can just wait it out until the market corrects itself by crashing
438.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
Because you can't have it both ways? I thought people in Apple world desired the walled garden experience where the guardian is so strict to "monitor the quality and safety of apps" that you can't possibly allow for side
439.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
In my experience, pays issues only get solved during hiring negotiations. That's it. During hiring (as author mentions) you have several people aligned to hire you at almost any cost. But after being hired - at most - you have only you
440.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
I wonder if similar approach was taken for for internet/www. Google? Did anyone worry about PageRank threat to life? Maybe PageRank will turn out to have been the human nemesis after all... Only in hundred of years time frame
441.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
I'm still looking for a simple installer for comfyUI... A brew command or a DMG would be great
442.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
Was he really sleeping in a model Y over multiple days?
443.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
"small creators" it's ridiculous to claim that "small creators" are the ones benefiting from the current implementation of "moral rights". Walt Disney started when copyright laws were much more lax. Then D
444.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
1. Prove it's your content 2. Prove I've used your content 3. Come collect your fee on my jurisdiction
445.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
I've been looking for the answer to this to have a chat interface to my obsidian markdown notes (the whole vault, not just rag of individual notes). Will be following these threads closely
446.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
How should someone know the terms of use BEFORE being served the data (including the terms)? It's not stealing if you're broadcasting.
447.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
But isn't this the case? Who's going after people to do whatever they want to data they already have?
448.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
But that's not what's happening: what's happening is the server is asking for the properties of the client and making a decision to serve based on response. Similar to presenting credentials to be served. Surely the server is
449.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
Not sure why you're being down voted: not everyone cares about all levels of the software stack. Most people can be perfectly functional as long as they see a "Google chrome" icon anywhere on the display and once in chrome th
450.
▲
by
627467
3y ago
In my view the fact that figma has been built for realtime collab just places it on totally different league. It's like office vs gdocs. It tool Microsoft years (a decade?) To catch-up and accept that most people collab online one way
More ›