627467

22 ms·

451.
by 627467 3y ago
> To the non-educated eye, this might look ok, but for a photographer it’s not, and for several reasons. There surely must be better examples to show "non-educated" plebs (to use the tone of the post) why webp is bad and to jus
452.
by 627467 3y ago
Her profile - as you state - checks lots of boxes: concerned highly credentialed young woman interested in an emerging field that is part of china-us battleground. Would look great on any corporate brochure
453.
by 627467 3y ago
To be honest, the passage describes high school drama. And the ensuing drama trigger by this just proves the point. This and the FTX saga just shows EA as nerdy movement in arrested development.
454.
by 627467 3y ago
Some are. The question is: is openAI? And even if they are, the outcome of this novela indicates it don't matter: the board folded.
455.
by 627467 3y ago
Did I - in any way - conveyed that Bret is NOT at the board for his qualifications?
456.
by 627467 3y ago
Because "rules based international order" can only really be enforced by a hegemon, and obviously the hegemon can't really "be it" and "be in it" simultaneously
457.
by 627467 3y ago
I'm sure the law specifies what the public is owed. And if not, I'm sure there's plenty reason to test this in court.
458.
by 627467 3y ago
I bet there are tons of seemingly "conflict of interest" in companies boards. In fact, being major shareholder qualifies (but not sufficiently) for the board. Jobs was Disney's board member after Pixar's acquisition. You
459.
by 627467 3y ago
Almost no one is talking about Brett. Either he is here to scare Musk, or - more likely IMO - to act as a Musk lightning rod. Musk takeover part 2?
460.
by 627467 3y ago
Should anyone feel 100% comfortable betting on a company that has only been (really) commercially engaged in the last 4 years? Whose success (albeit explosive) could only be seen in the last 18 months? If we are going to rank the concerns a
461.
by 627467 3y ago
Reading through comments I felt that at least superficially many in HN thought this was a fight between "business exec(s) and technical/qualified scientists" as if any organization can exist based purely on technical (as in t
462.
by 627467 3y ago
They could, or could they? Formally boards don't run companies. Would this scenario - besides ridiculous - be legal? Say they let 99% of the company walk. Who is qualified and responsible to do whatever needs to happened after that hap
463.
by 627467 3y ago
Just the whim of 1 person? Just the ego of 1 person? 700+ egos it seems. Ultimately, what is an organization if not the people who make it up? Regardless of what actually happened in this Mexican novela, whoever was steering the narrative -
464.
by 627467 3y ago
Decent broadband is probably not the main reason for urbanization but it doesn't help that economics will never make sense for non-urband broadband (and other stuff)
465.
by 627467 3y ago
I don't get the drama with "conflict of interests"... Aren't board members generally (always?) in representation of major shareholders? Isn't it obvious that shareholders have interests that are likely to be in conf
466.
by 627467 3y ago
A CEO is not a researcher. A researcher can be a CEO but in doing so stops being a researcher. Maybe (almost certainly) Sam is not a savior/hero, but he doesn't need to be a savior/hero. He just needs to gather more support t
467.
by 627467 3y ago
> Even if Altman had been engaged in some kind of criminal act, this is not the way in which you proceed. No information came to light to back this sudden and unexpected decisions but were there criminal acts involved, it certainly would
468.
by 627467 3y ago
- Portugal electricity prices: ranks top 30% of EU - Portugal per capita GDP: ranks bottom 30% of the EU
469.
by 627467 3y ago
It is obviously a technical challenge. Image yourself trying to facing 3 pictures, one of CSAM, another of terrorist material and just some random photo of random guy eating ice scream: what steps would you do to determine if this last phot
470.
by 627467 3y ago
Hoon? https://developers.urbit.org/reference/hoon/rune
471.
by 627467 3y ago
The range of use cases including media, gaming and compiling on similar form factor MacBook Air Mx is enormous compared to this similarly priced laptop.
472.
by 627467 3y ago
Whoa. Travellers are now responsible for all political and macroeconomical decisions on all countries/cities in the world. #shutdownTravelling
473.
by 627467 3y ago
Fast company along inc.com are among the worst offenders on invasive ads. Anytime I hit a amp link I can't block ads the first thing I do is open actual url. Autoplay video should be ilegal. I get these publications (similar to Google
474.
by 627467 3y ago
I could bet that number of users losing their account on mastodon on way or the other is proportionally higher than on Twitter. Instance admins are more powerful that reddit mods. Yeah, you could take your date elsewhere, but not your origi
475.
by 627467 3y ago
Actually the planet doesn't care about anything, including emissions. Humans do.
476.
by 627467 3y ago
+1
477.
by 627467 3y ago
At first glance I don't see reddit's mods role much different from Twitter community notes contributor or even a wikipedia editor. On the other end of the spectrum you have paid content mods at alphabet or meta. Yeah, wikipedia is
478.
by 627467 3y ago
> Plants in India undercut everyone in price and drove them out of the market by making a substandard and dangerous version of the drug violating basic safety standards Someone is buying those "substandard" products or it wou
479.
by 627467 3y ago
This is what happen when societies treat something as taboo. People who seek help can't have it: https://medium.com/matter/youre-16-youre-a-pedophile-you-don...
480.
by 627467 3y ago
At some point someone will realize that - particularly in UK - the taboo, histeria and irrationally around CP is net negative for actually doing good.

More ›