Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
317070
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
49 ms
·
601.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
Of course you require an email address to calculate that. In the last step of the form. A form that asked me for information which is very relevant for targeting me with adds.
602.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
Yes, but a lot of people consider the disputes correct, yet irrelevant to the main point. Moreover since their argument is that the computation could in fact be executed on current day's hardware, but they have not been able to do it t
603.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
I reckon one that has quantum error correction on qubits which present Boolean values. I.e. one which could also run a classical program. That is the quantum computer which is actually a quantum Turing machine and which can do speedups of e
604.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
As someone who did some academic research on the subject, I second this. Approval voting is the one which makes most sense, as it is a method which lies on the pareto curve of "optimal" voting methods. On top of that, it is also e
605.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
Those numbers have to be off: According to wikipedia [0]: English 379.0 million native speakers, 1.132 billion total French 76.8 million native speakers, 279.8 million total It seems you might have mixed the French native speakers with a (h
606.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
But do these 'analytically' orbit? I reckon such a proof must be quite intricate? Are there proofs for each of those families?
607.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
But (electric) bikes do? Yeah, you will probably own a car living in a rural area, but where I was from, when you went to the city you either switched modes (car+walk/scoot) or cycled to the city. The group of people who really has no
608.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
Yes, we have proofs (which probably can be proven formally!) that there are things which cannot be proven. That is essentially the incompleteness theorem [0] The smallest 'practical' example I know, is a finite state machine with
609.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
Because I'm an anarchist and believe that the only two people that can police communication between me and another person, are me and that other person. Live and let live.
610.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
I know. I don't want to go as far, but if I had to choose, I would also go for Jax, and help make it feature complete. However, it is not very feature-complete yet, and thus probably not as useful for everyone yet.
611.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
As someone who uses tensorflow a lot, I predict an enormous clusterfuck of a transition. Tensorflow has turned into a multiheaded monster, supporting many things and approaches but none of them very well. I mean, when relying on third party
612.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
I mean, you are basically saying that this man did not have a consciousness: https://neuroanthropology.net/2010/07/21/life-without-langua... I mean, there are plenty of language-less people. But they are clea
613.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
The escape velocity from the sun is 42.1 km/s, while the earth is orbiting at 29.78 km/s. The 29.78 km/s is 3 times closer to the escape velocity than to 0 km/s. This is the first order approximation reason.
614.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
Why is this result interesting? All of the particles involved are pretty exotic, and this is still fitting the Standard model. Can someone enlighten me?
615.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
It is the basic premise for GDPR in the EU. While convoluted (it did not end up that bad, or as bad as you'd predict), it actually delivers this idea in a workable way.
616.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
Exactly, and those fishing expedition questions are not interesting anyway. They are not what I want to find out about the story.
617.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
IIRC nationality is a human right (article 15) [0], so a state cannot strip you of your last nationality. But, it is only a right, so you can strip yourself of your last nationality and go stateless. [0] https://www.un.org/e
618.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
You are correct! I learned something again today. There is no thing the weak force keeps together, the strong force does both subatomic particles and quarks.
619.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
It is the weak force, strong is what keeps quarks together in subatomic particles like protons/neutrons. But yes, gravity is way too weak at that scale.
620.
▲
Switzerland’s first crypto banks receive licences
(swissinfo.ch)
1 points
by
317070
7y ago
|
0 comments
621.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
Does someone have the whole article? It looks very interesting!
622.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
Just a thought, but the cause-and-effect relationship you suggest between the protests and the trade war might be the other way around? I.e. the protests causing the timing of the trade war?
623.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
Aha, I did not know that! On the plus side, you could set up your own server, having the guarantee.
624.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
I use jit.si as replacement for Skype. It's in browser, encrypted, p2p and EFF approved. I don't know if they have apps, but as far as I know their server code is on github.
625.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
The confusion comes from the 'journal' aka topic on arXiv, which can have different settings for when an author can submit. Some are more stringent than others. It is not an arXiv wide issue.
626.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
Is there more than one robotics company in Odense?
627.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
Do you have a source for that number? I'd like to read into that.
628.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
Momentum and delay is a market inefficiency. The most efficient market is instantaneous.
629.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
Or they don't? I mean, it is very possible to have an extremely reduced impact on your environment. You can even have a positive impact! Not at our current average life style, but maybe even at our current average life quality. Populat
630.
▲
by
317070
7y ago
I think this is indeed nailing it. Companies are inefficient, but they get away with it because the market is even more inefficient.
More ›