3 ms·
I mean, you are basically saying that this man did not have a consciousness: https://neuroanthropology.net/2010/07/21/life-without-language/ https://neuroanthro
by 317070 7y ago
I mean, you are basically saying that this man did not have a consciousness: https://neuroanthropology.net/2010/07/21/life-without-language/ https://neuroanthropology.net/2010/07/21/life-without-langua...
I mean, there are plenty of language-less people. But they are clearly conscious. So why is this even a discussion? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Man_Without_Words https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Man_Without_Words
- pbhjpbhj 7y ago>her work with Ildefonso, who had grown up without learning sign language or any other form of communication. // It sounds like she's limiting her definition of language to "ability to communicate". Which I think it's wrong. One example is how babies can communicate with sign long before they can talk. When I learnt some BSL I was essentially in a situation like Ildenfonso (sp?) in your link. But, I certainly had language, it just wouldn't let me communicate in that situation, it essentially became a private language only for me. Now, Ildenfonso may not have developed a sophisticated language, but once the penny dropped and he began to communicate in sign with his tutor it seems like he already had a working language to match the signs to, that better explains - IMO - the rush to identify signs for the physical items around him, rather than waiting to learn as things came up.