317070

49 ms·

631.
by 317070 7y ago
3 out of the 5 comments in your history have a link to paddle in it.
632.
by 317070 7y ago
That is very achievable :) stop blundering/hanging pieces and you are there. I myself since discovering lichess this year set myself the goal to go 1000 to 1500 lichess elo, which is approximately the same. It's May and I'm s
633.
by 317070 7y ago
Is uranium mining included in these numbers? Edit: it seems to be what mainly contributed to the nuclear numbers: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014067360... > The sources of the effect
634.
by 317070 7y ago
I think 'accessible' being the key word here. I read the article, and as someone who does not have English as a first language and therefore know next to nothing on its literature, I am still amazed by its humanities focus on diss
635.
by 317070 7y ago
I am neither the smartest, best athlete or best looking by multiple degrees of magnitude. Why I should be the richest by multiple order magnitudes is a complete miracle to me. Yes, there will always be inequality. Yes, that is a good thing
636.
by 317070 7y ago
Of course. Not that I agree with that idea, but no one should give up the wealth that they built up without sufficient guarantees (and the guarantees need to be enormous) that everyone else will and that it will be used for the greater good
637.
by 317070 7y ago
How is that relevant? I would give up 83% of my wealth if all other wealthy would and it would solve inequality. If it is only me that needs to give up 83%, then not only is it not fair, it also does not solve societal inequality.
638.
by 317070 7y ago
> r must be greater than g for investments to make sense in the first place Why would that be true? Say r was lower than g, what is my alternative to investing my capital?
639.
by 317070 7y ago
Also confirming that r>>g, returns are considerably larger than economic growth, validating Piketty. I.e. it is increasingly getting more beneficial to own than to work. And from this data it seems that the difference is even accelera
640.
by 317070 7y ago
Here's the thing. Whose trade-offs are we talking about? Why should I not get involved if I understand those trade-offs? Everyone can always claim that there are trade-offs I don't understand about the great injustices of the worl
641.
by 317070 7y ago
At least Belgium officially uses spaces as thousands seperator [0] [0] http://ond.vvkso-ict.com/vvksomainnieuw/brochure/Vouwblad%20...
642.
by 317070 8y ago
It is already reasonably robust though: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MIbFvK2S9g8 It is not magic, but I can imagine the method being extended to be more robust to rotation/shearing (by improving the metric being opt
643.
by 317070 8y ago
Yes, but I did not use that one as I don't like that visualization. My reptilian brain made that sound way bigger than it actually is. As the horizon is only 5-10km away, I cannot really estimate a distance of 500km. I can see the prob
644.
by 317070 8y ago
Also, you are looking at a piece of the sky the size of 5 atoms at armslength.
645.
by 317070 8y ago
It's the latter. This is an image in radio-frequency brightness of the object, so not visible frequencies of light. But yeah, it also looks like the 'hot' colormap to me.
646.
by 317070 8y ago
Because LSTM's are proven over time to be industry grade, and are not latest-greatest-but-no-one-has-really-reproduced-the-results-yet. A paper with inductive results is just a first step in a really long process until ideas are common
647.
by 317070 8y ago
I cannot access this website (from London). I get "Web server is down" and ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT. Since people are upvoting and commenting, can someone share this article?
648.
by 317070 8y ago
Works for me (in the UK) https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/23/us/politics/russian-hacki... Edit: I see what you mean. This is the source after fixing the link: https://www.armed-services.se
649.
by 317070 8y ago
If this interests you, make sure to look into Golay codes: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_Golay_code This code is a mathematical miracle. Apparently, number theory comes together exactly such as to allow you to c
650.
About Alphastar(reddit.com)
2 points by 317070 8y ago|0 comments
651.
by 317070 8y ago
I have one in tf, so I can confirm it is possible.
652.
by 317070 8y ago
The following is not common knowledge, but I'm fairly knowledgeable in the area so hear me out :) We thought for a long time that neurons were fairly easy to imitate. After all, most of what they do seems to be exchanging neurotransmit
653.
by 317070 8y ago
Hey, do you have a source for this: > and in one anecdote of his, forgetting to do the search and replace I would be very interested in that (but could not find it myself).
654.
by 317070 8y ago
It is kind of the case, but it does not need to expand the whole node to find the maximum. It samples some children instead from a NN (the Monte Carlo aspect)
655.
by 317070 8y ago
It's good. Like, not for the algorithmic side, but the emotional side. It is very accessible even when you cannot work with computers.
656.
by 317070 8y ago
Here's the thing, in my opinion, that is the best attitude toward vegetarianism. One of the reasons we still slaughter so many animals, is that there is this misconception that for some reason, vegetarianism is an all or nothing type o
657.
by 317070 8y ago
No, they don't. Now, feel free to _show_ me that they do, and I will gladly accept to have been wrong. But this argument that because of some very theoretical view on the problem the current engineering solutions should be abandoned, w
658.
by 317070 8y ago
>What is worse than academic groups getting scooped by DeepMind? The fact that the collective powers of Novartis, Merck, Pfizer, etc, with their hundreds of thousands (~million?) of employees, let an industrial lab that is a complete out
659.
by 317070 8y ago
I am of the opposite opinion. Don't post links to the abstracts as the pdf's contain them too. But the pdf's also contain figures and other things which make it easier to browse, whereas the arXiv abstract page contains a lot
660.
by 317070 8y ago
The contest IS an open demonstration? You get unlabeled data, need to guess the labels and after you submit the labels the external comitee tells you how good you were. At this point it might be unreproducible, but the paper is about it bei

More ›