23B1

37 ms·

1. 541.▲
   by 23B1 3y ago

   Single transactions are easy to do. Extremely hard when your trading volume is substantial.
2. 542.▲
   by 23B1 3y ago

   You don't?
3. 543.▲
   by 23B1 3y ago

   Nanowrimo was started in 1999 ! It's a great project and there's no better time than now to start your book.
4. 544.▲
   by 23B1 3y ago

   What a silly comment. McDonalds doesn't make poisonous coca-cola, they just distribute it.
5. 545.▲
   by 23B1 3y ago

   Tobacco doesn't kill users, cancer kills users. I can apply the same silly pedantry ad infinitum if you like.
6. 546.▲
   by 23B1 3y ago

   Smartphones and candy crush will be our generation's cigarettes. FAANG = Big Tobacco.
7. 547.▲
   by 23B1 3y ago

   Can you elaborate a bit on why you think the market for distinct character/personality models is massive right now? I ask only because I've been asked by a fairly well-known GAI company to help them 'personality-ize' som
8. 548.▲
   by 23B1 3y ago

   I've done marathons and numerous sleep deprivation/caloric deprevation events and never got to hallucinations, only micro-naps which, on occasion, resulted in my waking up with a mouthful of gravel. ...So whats your tip to achievi
9. 549.▲
   by 23B1 3y ago

   You're basically correct, it can be anywhere from about 6 to 18 months. Lots of variables determine that; if they're more experienced it can be as simple as getting them to a certain revenue number sufficient to replace me, or as
10. 550.▲
    by 23B1 3y ago

    Scale from 0-1 kills so many companies so I'm glad you're asking at this stage. What you need is a 'specialized generalist' someone who knows enough to set you up for success, get the first few hires, get your sales engi
11. 551.▲
    by 23B1 3y ago

    Especially since kids will need all of about 3 seconds to find some other app/site to filter or modify content, and anyone with kids knows this. This article's a nothingburger (unfortunately).
12. 552.▲
    by 23B1 3y ago

    If you can't imagine that a bureaucracy as large as the united states government might not have competing interests within... I'm not sure I can help you.
13. 553.▲
    by 23B1 3y ago

    https://archive.is/908kf and Non paywalled article: https://finance.yahoo.com/news/housing-market-starting-crack...
14. 554.▲
    by 23B1 3y ago

    Very sorry to let you down.
15. 555.▲
    by 23B1 3y ago

    > Not really sure what you're saying here. That's pretty clear, friendo. I can't do you thinking for you, but there's plenty of ways to mitigate risk and protect identities beyond deletion of the data. > Orrrr you
16. 556.▲
    by 23B1 3y ago

    SNCOs have up-or-out too, for sure. I agree that the promotion system across the board is FUBAR. I'm talking about other sytems, typically at the unit level, that can be used to supplement or even side-load the current 'official&#
17. 557.▲
    by 23B1 3y ago

    I was a Green Beret for 15 years and have worked for DOD/IC for a subsequent five. The rating system I described was used throughout SFQC and on some ODAs and at multiple schools like SOTIC and SFAUC. NCOERs/OERs aren't great
18. 558.▲
    by 23B1 3y ago

    > If there was, their data wouldn't be lumped in with everyone else You're giving the World's Largest And Most Ineffective Bureaucracy far too much agency. > You won't be able to remove that stuff now that it'
19. 559.▲
    by 23B1 3y ago

    And you are ignoring the many competing interests within and throughout the federal government. Source: me, with 20 years inside DOD/IC.
20. 560.▲
    by 23B1 3y ago

    You are incorrect that there's no infra to secure people with clearances. WRT your second point, 'all the data is out there' is an awful argument. The solution is simple: if you want to do business with or in the United State
21. 561.▲
    by 23B1 3y ago

    I've seen multiple. The one I like is 'pinks and blues' where you're given two of each - a pink and a blue - and you write out why you think two dudes should get a blue (good) and a bad (pink). If you start accruing a bu
22. 562.▲
    by 23B1 3y ago

    The reason is twofold: 1. Servicemembers hold security clearances and thus access to critical things. 2. Leaked PII is a national security threat. This report, I'd argue, is good 'marketing' for the very real need for privacy
23. 563.▲
    by 23B1 3y ago

    You mean SF-86, not DD-214
24. 564.▲
    by 23B1 3y ago

    It's interesting. I have seen rating systems work – in the military. They're harsh to some, but in some situations, you have to filter out B and C players to keep the A players alive. I do think transparent systems w/360º pee
25. 565.▲
    U.S. military members' personal data being sold by online brokers(axios.com)

    163 points by 23B1 3y ago|185 comments
26. 566.▲
    by 23B1 3y ago

    PDF of the study: https://techpolicy.sanford.duke.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites...
27. 567.▲
    by 23B1 3y ago

    Most philosophies fail in the execution, typically because the execution is handled by humans.
28. 568.▲
    by 23B1 3y ago

    Could investors have been duped once again by the tech hypecycle? No way!
29. 569.▲
    by 23B1 3y ago

    Tell me you're too young to remember the cold war without telling me ;-)
30. 570.▲
    by 23B1 3y ago

    All the real OGs remember having to haul the PLGR around Ft. Bragg. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precision_Lightweight_GPS_Rece...