4 ms·
I've seen multiple. The one I like is 'pinks and blues' where you're given two of each - a pink and a blue - and you write out why you think two dudes should ge
by 23B1 3y ago
I've seen multiple. The one I like is 'pinks and blues' where you're given two of each - a pink and a blue - and you write out why you think two dudes should get a blue (good) and a bad (pink). If you start accruing a bunch of pinks, there's a problem.
It's very simple and probably wouldn't pass muster with an HR department, but it was effective at getting rid of turds.
- esafak 3y agoCan you split the votes as you want among the candidates or does each have to get at least one review? How often do you rate? Do you only rate peers, or new hires? What about superiors? I could not find any reference to this system. As a person below said it recalls https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_voting https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limited_voting
- immibis 3y agoIt sounds like it's not an automated rating system and doesn't rank people. It only identifies really good people and really bad people.
- projektfu 3y agoIt's a form of limited voting, with both approval and disapproval votes. In a unit, maybe there are 20-40 "candidates" and you are given four votes, two up and two down. This will probably identify a couple people receiving more than one vote. Limited voting has had interesting results in things like city council elections.