1over137

21 ms·

391.
by 1over137 2y ago
If they were as smart as Apple, they'd probably try!
392.
by 1over137 2y ago
Any good resources on how to enable it for existing Apache severs?
393.
by 1over137 2y ago
Indeed. But this is how hospitals run.
394.
by 1over137 2y ago
text version: https://lite.cnn.com/2024/08/10/politics/trump-campaign-blam...
395.
by 1over137 2y ago
https://archive.ph/P8mxQ
396.
by 1over137 2y ago
Can you elaborate?
397.
by 1over137 2y ago
Must be a factory farm? Surely the mother knows how to feed the calf, and the calf knows how to feed from the mother…
398.
by 1over137 2y ago
Sure, but strlcpy is better than strcpy and strncpy (for strings). I almost never see code that uses the return value of any of them. It is a simple refactoring to change strcpy/strncpy to strlcpy and, though it doesn't solve tru
399.
by 1over137 2y ago
Cool, didn't know, thanks for sharing. Well, literally 25 years after OpenBSD added strlcpy, but better late than never I guess.
400.
by 1over137 2y ago
>An empirically baseless conspiracy theory. You misunderstand I think. I don't think it's likely. It would be easy to catch them. I also don't distrust Apple completely. I was (pedantically) replying to your comment that &
401.
by 1over137 2y ago
>Which is useless if they simply encrypt the data before sending it over SSL. Not entirely useless, you'd still know they were sending something and it would be proof they could bypass Little Snitch.
402.
by 1over137 2y ago
>They could release an update that allows later updates to bypass Little Snitch Or the ability could be there already without us knowing. But fortunately we can still run our own routers/switches and see outgoing traffic. If you co
403.
by 1over137 2y ago
> 1) They can't push software to my computer, because I've blocked the software update mechanism with Little Snitch They can because they (Apple) run in kernel space and Little Snitch no longer does/can. So LS, god love
404.
by 1over137 2y ago
strlcpy() is my favourite, alas the GNU folks stubbornly refuse to embrace it, last I checked.
405.
by 1over137 2y ago
The reasoned arguments are well known and have been for decades. Humans are not all that reasoned; emotional argument is often called for.
406.
by 1over137 2y ago
Are you sure "Microsoft is responsible for that design"? Do we know Cloudstrike didn't choose to do it in-kernel even though there was another way they could have done it in userspace?
407.
by 1over137 2y ago
Wow, you know a lot of people!
408.
by 1over137 2y ago
Because there is software that runs only on certain OSes, and not others.
409.
by 1over137 2y ago
Why do so many seem to think everything should be on top of http? DNS, LDAP, where does it stop?
410.
by 1over137 2y ago
What is SPA?
411.
by 1over137 2y ago
You don’t need Apple as your saviour, there are expensive non crap brands out there. I’ve liked Ruckus for example.
412.
by 1over137 2y ago
Not sure about that. In Montreal, they refuse to remove the McGill encampment for example.
413.
by 1over137 2y ago
>Alberta is a complete aberration in North American democracy Hmm, seems to me several US states have been the same: Vermont, Utah, Wyoming, Nebraska, Idaho...
414.
by 1over137 2y ago
Asking me to stop using my preferred convention is tantamount to 'reprogramming' me.
415.
by 1over137 2y ago
Outside the USA, including Canada, downtown cores are where (many, but not all) rich people live.
416.
by 1over137 2y ago
Yes. But it’s only convient connection from other Macs, not from Windows or unix.
417.
by 1over137 2y ago
only from a Mac , not to a Mac.
418.
by 1over137 2y ago
Never heard of it. Shockingly little on wikipedia for example.
419.
by 1over137 2y ago
Companies file patents all the time, for various reasons, including defensive against competitors.
420.
by 1over137 2y ago
Honest question: why do you need CloudFlare, why not self-host?

More ›