1_2__3

27 ms·

241.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
It's extremely challenging not to read this article as satire.
242.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
How about we let the drama stay in the drama subreddits, and in the non-drama subreddits we act like adults. For fuck's sake, not everything in life has to be a cause.
243.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
So... What exactly is the cost to government being justified here? Usually a tax is to pay for something, in this case it seems to be just "hey we want some of that money, give us some". What the fuck.
244.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
My suggestion: use a nonsense answer and use it for all of them. I don't reuse passwords but for exactly the reasons you state the answer to all my security challenges is something like "Because a kipper doesn't red the blue.
245.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
Combine this with an increasing trend in grocery and drug stores to only stock 1 "name brand" and everything else is house-branded and we're in for a rough time. For now you can still use brand loyalty, but what happens when
246.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
You are completely wrong, as any biologist with even a passing knowledge of geese will tell you. They are absolutely aggressive and vicious.
247.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
Yet managers are incentivized to make their employees successful and are generally considered to be doing well when their employees' careers advance. I don't know why you think they're a hindrance. If you find no managers eve
248.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
The Air France example is not a good one - there's no indication the pilots didn't hear or heed the warning, it's that a loud voice blaring "STALL!" was only one of multiple "pay attention to me now" thing
249.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
I remember asking someone why Cyberpunk died and he said, a dystopian and orwellian future where we lose our individuality in favor of technical advancement? Why would anyone be interested in that as fiction, it's what we're livin
250.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
Yes they are and yes it is. Marketing is trying to convince you otherwise and I'm a little shocked you swallow it so easily.
251.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
You seem to think that business is the public interest. You are incorrect.
252.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
That is not even a little bit true.
253.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
As an aside, while the WSJ may have some credibility it's not that far away ideologically from Bretibart. In particular I was reading an article there recently about the Wells Fargo scandal and despite it not being an editorial the ent
254.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
This is certainly a lot of words, which I think I can summarize as "smartphones are easy and powerful and flexible and DSLRs should be as easy and powerful and flexible too". Which is sort of silly, it's like saying buses car
255.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
So calling your opponent "Crooked <name>" and repeatedly referring to them by what is effectively a slur was a... Democrat strategy?
256.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
I think you're giving far too much intellectual credit to what is basically just a feminist rant dressed up as concern trolling for the industry.
257.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
If you took a less condescending tone your argument might be more persuasive with a wider audience.
258.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
I know nobody wants to admit this but this is only going to get worse. India and China are going to eat the world, because this is a numbers game.
259.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
Surprised nobody mentioned the "average age" comment.
260.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
It's hard not to see this as a life-and-death struggle between people who think public transportation is the way of the future and people who think cars are the future. I know which way the HN crowd leans, but I feel compelled to point
261.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
Anyone living here could have told you this years ago.
262.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
I think you're mistaking interia for vision.
263.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
I think you're absolutely right.
264.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
Given I saw this as top on /r/futurology I figured it was clickbait BS. But since it was posted to HN I thought I'd give it a read. It's clickbait BS.
265.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
Not accommodating kids in the workplace has worked pretty great for us for a few hundred years now. I'm not sure your arguments for changing that are compelling.
266.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
Calling HDMI outdated helpfully allows me to ignore the rest of your comment.
267.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
Not smart of them to have a product guy write this. Even if he had it would have been better delivered (if shadow written) by someone in engineering. They're customers are not necessarily people who want to hear technical claims from P
268.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
You are falling for Google's PR-speak. This kind of language they've used for literally dozens of dead projects/products over the years. This is the language Google uses when they say "we quit". It's couched in
269.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
> The pastiches produced via this algorithm look spectacular Not really they don't, no. It's kind of cool, that's about it.
270.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
At what point does corporate speak become nonsense gibberish? This post is amazingly close.

More ›