1_2__3

31 ms·

91.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
"Private" means "unavailable to the defendant" in this case which runs counter to some of the deepest roots of our justice system. You do not get to convict someone based on evidence that can't be entered at trial.
92.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
I don't believe you're calculating vacancy rates the same way the article is. You're talking about single-unit vacancy over time, the article is referring to citywide vacancy over volume. Depending on how that number if calcu
93.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
Not to be glib, but why not both? Are you a recording engineer and capable of speaking to the points he makes, or is your entire counter-argument "I don't believe that"?
94.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
Er isn't AFS still essentially vapor ware at this point?
95.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
So what if he'd been a windows device driver dev? Does ICE have domain experts for all the various engineering professions? I'm gonna guess no.
96.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
I can only assume your being down voted by young people who have no idea how beneficial a routine is for a married parent.
97.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
Fraud is a legal term that presumes a finding in a court of law to be anything other than a nonsense word (that means whatever someone thinks it means). It's absolutely correct in this case for the headline to refer to "redirect&q
98.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
I do think 'realness' factors into it though. If you can connect what you're doing with the value the company gets from you doing it, you naturally are going to feel like you doing well == company doing well == security for a
99.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
Thanks for asking; I was always curious myself.
100.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
Did you ask for an example for honest debate, or to have a straw man you could pick apart? Because it seems like it's the latter. You're arguing his example and ignoring the larger point (likely intentionally).
101.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
If you're going to concede that point (ss) then the same applies to Medicare. This completely destroying your argument coincidentally.
102.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
Maybe one of you two should actually cite something instead of saying "yes they did/no they didn't" silly games.
103.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
Better question: why did he abandon it?
104.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
Citizens are members of countries, not the planet. It would be more accurate to say "people" instead of citizens - the word itself implies nationality
105.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
You used a fad (Pokémon Go) to make a case for longevity. Not sure that's going to convince anyone.
106.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
This is the correct answer.
107.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
He said that because back then he was working on a new OS. This was PR.
108.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
I've always said Java was the first language ecosystem that let developers write code they neither understood nor could manage. I've been doing this long enough to remember what life was like pre-Java, and I did not at that time h
109.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
I'm remembering tools I've worked with where the cheeky dev required things like type the sentence "I know what I am doing and wish to proceed." in order to perform unsafe operations. I've always wondered why ops ha
110.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
It feels weird to me that their marketing pitch is "for you big enterprise customers we've made a simple to use version". That's home or small biz use, not enterprise. The idea of a dumbed-down/less features/no
111.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
How do you expect this will work? Everything created by humans from here on out must be accessible to every last minuscule quadrant of humanity or it's banned? Nobody's allowed to release audio without texted or text without audio
112.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
Welcome to hardcore liberal ideology. Yes, they expected Berkeley to spend tens of thousands of dollars adding captioning for the tiny fraction of people who need it.
113.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
Could we maybe have a sober conversation about Uber that doesn't involve self driving cars? Because I hate to tell you, but whatever reckoning is coming for Uber will come long before self driving cars are viable. I do not understand w
114.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
> He made a decision which affects this mans livelihood. You don't get to challenge everyone in your life who makes decisions that directly or indirectly affect you.
115.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
What a profoundly ridiculous comparison.
116.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
Stop with the standard of living shaming. You're not convincing anyone and you're ignoring the fact that even if you adjust/account for that the issues being discussed here are the same. In other words you're just doing
117.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
I'd argue Fowler's claims are similarly unchallenged.
118.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
In what way do you expect it to be a "mixed bag"? What are the positive parts? You seem to claim smaller ISPs will benefit, but we've already got a dearth of small ISPs in the US and I don't see the FCCs decisions likely
119.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
I'm sorry but none of this story makes any sense at all and I feel like I'm living in some kind of weird alternate reality. Sit down, look at the world around you, and ask yourself if the account seems plausible at all . The numb
120.
by 1_2__3 10y ago
> In the US - people are far more gregarious and open personally. Can I just share my belief that this is polite fiction? It's certainly the view of America that we Americans have for ourselves, but can you honestly say you see evid

More ›