3 ms·

> He made a decision which affects this mans livelihood. You don't get to challenge everyone in your life who makes decisions that directly or indirectly affec

• placeybordeaux 10y ago
  It's not like he had a right to challenge him, he had an opportunity, which he took.
• frgtpsswrdlame 10y ago
  Hypothetically, don't you think a world where you could do that would be better? Besides this isn't exactly indirect. There is a direct line from Kalanick's decisions to this mans paycheck.
• orthecreedence 10y ago
  > You don't get to challenge everyone in your life who makes decisions that directly or indirectly affect you. I believe the first amendment disagrees. If you have a grievance with someone, it is absolutely within your right to tell them. In fact, I'd argue that a healthy, functional society relies entirely on people being completely honest with each other.
• random314 10y ago
  > You don't get to challenge everyone in your life who makes decisions that directly or indirectly affect you. Where did you get that idea?
• Aeolun 10y ago
  Well, yes, you do. At least, there's generally no reason why you couldn't challenge them. No guarantee they'll listen.