15155

28 ms·

661.
by 15155 1y ago
> As a software engineer, this means job security, lol. My bro Claude would like a word with you.
662.
by 15155 1y ago
You don't need to simulate the design completely/simultaneously. The FPGA sim implementation might only contain 1 CUDA SM, for instance. For large ASIC designs like this, companies often use numerous (12+) FPGAs connected via tran
663.
by 15155 1y ago
Every digital ASIC design is simulated on FPGAs first.
664.
by 15155 1y ago
In theory, yes, in practice this probably requires engineering beyond what is available to these organizations (or the cost profile of the vessel.) These aren't autonomous true submarines, they're semi-submersibles. Weather and su
665.
by 15155 1y ago
Where do you think this submersible was manufactured?
666.
by 15155 1y ago
You need far more than a few hundred watts to move something in the open water, and these semi-submersibles aren't typically more than 30' vessels. The math doesn't work out.
667.
by 15155 1y ago
One random cop makes one ignorant statement and now all "cops in Spain" think something.
668.
by 15155 1y ago
You should definitely build a crypto accelerator - just don't integrate it into OpenSSL (painful codebase to work in, no speed benefit, etc.)
669.
by 15155 1y ago
Yes, this is why FPGAs are used as NICs in many situations, but the folks doing this are of course not using OpenSSL.
670.
by 15155 1y ago
Even without the extensions, by the time you've moved the workload to the FPGA and back, the CPU has already completed whatever operation your FPGA was going to complete with OpenSSL. FPGA cryptographic acceleration is about batch task
671.
by 15155 1y ago
Modern BTC ASICs consist of 1600-3200 SHA256 cores and only output nonces for sha256(sha256(btcBlockHeader)) - there's no memory or ability to obtain other output.
672.
by 15155 1y ago
Unless you're talking about niche algorithms (and even then), the FPGA will get smoked by a CPU for most common tasks one would use OpenSSL for.
673.
by 15155 1y ago
Yes, but a designed-for-FPGA SHA256 implementation looks very different than an ASIC SHA256 implementation - the ASIC has far greater routing flexibility and density, and can therefore use far more combinatorial logic between register stage
674.
by 15155 1y ago
SHA256 is extremely FF-heavy, you need around 200k for an optimized, unrolled, pipelined implementation. UltraScale+ chips will run a proper design at 600MHz-800MHz, big chips might be able to fit 24 cores. The Artix chip OP used is extreme
675.
by 15155 1y ago
Now try a fully unrolled/pipelined design that emits one hash per clock cycle for actual parallelization.
676.
by 15155 1y ago
> They could theoretically decrypt any iPhone they're given with new firmware but they don't want to. This is untrue at some technical level: Apple is currently unable to break AES-256. The San Bernadino case was about having A
677.
by 15155 1y ago
> Like the existing state-owned liquor stores in many states? State-owned liquor stores pay rent or own property. Grocery stores are a business with 5%-8% margins, how much more should they cede?
678.
by 15155 1y ago
> Couldn't you wire most of the GPIOs together, they start off at high impedance, then let them work out who does what with plenty of options for weird processor sharing arrangements. This is a ton of software to build. Fast Linux-c
679.
by 15155 1y ago
> I thought the only way a rp2350 could act as a USB host was via PIO? With the vendor SDK driver, yes. The controller can operate in Host mode if you BYO driver.
680.
by 15155 1y ago
So is "shall not be infringed"
681.
by 15155 1y ago
> What is the source of this righteous indignation? You think countries invite foreigners here with the patronizing attitude of “you’re lucky to be here, don’t say a fucking word”? Yes, I do think that's how countries invite foreign
682.
by 15155 1y ago
> Your opinion doesn't trump universal human rights. Nor should it. Guess what? You don't have a universal human right to a visa, even if you do have a right to free speech. > What if the political issues affect you as a vis
683.
by 15155 1y ago
> conflate vocally anti-genocidal students I don't want foreign students (or otherwise) being "vocal" for literally any reason whatsoever. Go to school, become a citizen if you wish, and then participate in the political
684.
by 15155 1y ago
> I'd certainly expect visitors to be held to the same standards as the natives. Visitors are held to a higher standard than natives. Visitors do not have control, a vote, etc: they are temporarily permitted by the privilege of po
685.
by 15155 1y ago
Ah yes, because we don't automatically tolerate foreign political activists (or intelligence operatives, who cares, right?), freedom is all but lost, right?
686.
by 15155 1y ago
> Along with the push for ending birth right citizenship Which other countries in the world allow pregnant vacationers to birth citizens?
687.
by 15155 1y ago
We're talking about foreigners: if you are a guest in someone's country, home, wherever, you should be respectful and quiet. I don't want any foreigners contributing to any political activism whatsoever, regardless of ide
688.
by 15155 1y ago
It truly does not matter how this opinion can shift with the political climate: foreigners aren't citizens, no matter how much folks would like this to be the case.
689.
by 15155 1y ago
> anti-american but keeps their opinions to themself, and someone that has no opinions Why do we need to be admitting anti-American individuals to this country for any reason whatsoever? News flash: visas are a privilege, not a right.
690.
by 15155 1y ago
> this gets reversed early on. Through what legal avenue?

More ›