13years

69 ms·

751.
by 13years 11y ago
The speed improvement for all file search is amazing. Searching the whole project as you type is a really nice feature.
752.
Brackets editor 1.4 released with Instant Search across all files(github.com)
2 points by 13years 11y ago|0 comments
753.
by 13years 11y ago
Anyone know how this compares to Theseus? https://github.com/adobe-research/theseus
754.
by 13years 11y ago
I'm currently using Brackets mostly because it performs much better than Atom. Interestingly, in some cases according to this, it even beats Sublime. Comparison of Atom, Brackets, Sublime, VS Code https://github.com/ado
755.
by 13years 11y ago
I think MS Visual Studio Code has set the bar pretty high for what's possible. The DOM may be an inhibitor, but Code has shown you can still get very good performance.
756.
by 13years 11y ago
The other check and balance was also that each state were to have militias. So it wouldn't be just citizens against 1 federally controlled military.
757.
by 13years 11y ago
You focus on not just making people healthy, but making them optimally so. In the more narrow field of life extension within alternative medicine there is quite a bit of good research and the Life Extension organization would be an example
758.
by 13years 11y ago
That assumes there is some systematic process in which established medicine adopts alternative methods once they have been validated. However, this is a simplistic view that is quite far from reality. First, the practices are totally diffe
759.
by 13years 11y ago
This has been improved and no longer has this limit. However, I still find Brackets more responsive in general and is what I still use mostly. I think the future has a lot of potential though, as Visual Studio Code has demonstrated you can
760.
by 13years 11y ago
It was a disappointment for myself. The 3d planets was interesting, but not in a big way during actual gameplay. It actually made the UI a little more annoying and just didn't reach the level of the professional UI of Supreme Command
761.
by 13years 11y ago
And in the case of it being false, the restriction isn't on the grounds of free speech, but is on the grounds of property rights of the theater in which your actions have done damage.
762.
by 13years 11y ago
Rust would really be exciting to see it supported.
763.
by 13years 11y ago
Another great site of challenges can be found at http://codewars.com
764.
by 13years 11y ago
Basically this is the evolution towards Minority Report. We are destroying the concept of innocent until proven guilty and are convicting people for what might happen instead of what did happen.
765.
by 13years 11y ago
Visual slick edit claims to support files up to 2TB http://www.slickedit.com/products/slickedit/new-features
766.
by 13years 11y ago
It is not just a philosophical thought experiment. http://arxiv.org/abs/1210.1847
767.
by 13years 11y ago
Interesting point on the perspective of "this is true". Does that mean creationism would be an acceptable topic if not presented in the context of "this is true"? I think the problem with creationism is that even though
768.
by 13years 11y ago
Proponents of creationism do use science, although it is selective science. I think it is important part of critical thinking to analyze a theory in respect to whether it takes into account all evidence or selective evidence. As far as fal
769.
by 13years 11y ago
huh? Hilarious response. Was that even suppose to be a reply to this thread?
770.
by 13years 11y ago
Sure, and the method by which government makes decisions certainly is not the scientific method and should not weigh in on such matters. But still, even if you constrain yourself to such a definition of what is right, in reality you still m
771.
by 13years 11y ago
"relation to the Socratic method is dubious". Possibly, but what a coincidence that at least 4 such notables were his students. Xenophon, Plato, Aristotle, and Aristophanes "The Socratic method will not help you decide if th
772.
by 13years 11y ago
So here are a couple of references. This one makes the assertion, but doesn't describe how it was derived. http://www.winwenger.com/socmeth3.htm However, this one does describe how probably such an estimate has been de
773.
by 13years 11y ago
There is research indicating this. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3871217/ However, it would be foolish to just stop sugar without seeing a doctor and assume all is going to be well.
774.
by 13years 11y ago
You should consider that the 'evidence' based medicine you speak of is largely based on 53 studies, of which 47 could not be reproduced. http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/03/28/us-science-canc
775.
by 13years 11y ago
I didn't expect anyone to take the example as a literal. The example was only a concept in response to the original poster who used it as a concept prop for their argument. "Stick to what's right" lol, that's the p
776.
by 13years 11y ago
That is not what I stated. Banning is saying that we can't discuss why 2+2 is not 5, because that subject is banned. If a lot of people come often come to a wrong conclusion, you should be able to teach and discuss why that happens. Ba
777.
by 13years 11y ago
Because banning gives a government the power to hide the truth. Who gets to decide something is a lie? The majority may all be in favor this time, but what gets banned next? There is no issue with schools deciding it is not in their inter
778.
by 13years 11y ago
Yes, if he new about it and didn't stop it, or even in some way condoned it then he is certainly has responsibility.
779.
by 13years 11y ago
Actually it seems their selector is bugged. If you hover over them individually, two of them are tagged with "Large Data Set" Sigma and Dygraphs
780.
by 13years 11y ago
There really is no more Tea Party. It was co-opted by the establishment. The original Tea Party was far more libertarian and stood against all those things you list.

More ›