13years

74 ms·

781.
by 13years 11y ago
Point understood; however, when you do have the full capability to end something, and you don't, then you do have full responsibility for the present day situation.
782.
by 13years 11y ago
Not admitting science is flawed would equate it to a religion. Ironically this would then place such reasoning within the same group of subjects you criticize. Some further information on flaws of scientific consensus. https://p
783.
by 13years 11y ago
That implies that you might have actually read the contents of a bill or two. Something that congress doesn't actually do anymore.
784.
by 13years 12y ago
How is the editing experience? Is it faster than Atom?
785.
by 13years 12y ago
It doesn't mean dismiss, but likewise it also shouldn't be the means to dismiss opposing arguments for which it most often used. What we think of scientific consensus may not be what it actually is in reality. https://p
786.
by 13years 12y ago
I think "consensus" is a term we should all be wary of no matter what the argument. In order to discover merits of an argument one needs to really dig into the evidence on both sides regardless of so called consensus. I recall ab
787.
by 13years 12y ago
I think you highly underestimate the influence of the this industry and the pressure it can exert. "U.S. Government Planned To “Retaliate & Cause Pain” On Countries Refusing GMOs" http://www.collective-evolution.com
788.
by 13years 12y ago
It is because the industry has done a great job as labeling the critics as anti-science. Yet the source of the controversy for anyone who spends enough time to look into it is other scientist. It is somewhat ironic, that most everyone agre
789.
by 13years 12y ago
People don't think random mutations are good either. Ironically, though, we may get more of that due to push back against GMOs. http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/articles/2013-11-21/monsanto-vs-... Yet to be
790.
by 13years 12y ago
It is being worked on. They hope to make significant improvements when this is done. https://github.com/atom/text-document
791.
by 13years 12y ago
"which makes shipping apps a lot easier atm" Yet, the windows and linux builds are not available?
792.
by 13years 12y ago
Thank you! Good to see at least some people are awake. Although a bit disappointing more didn't point this out.
793.
by 13years 12y ago
Surveillance of an individual because there is reasonable suspicion is accepted. However, throwing a huge net and catching everybody, then later filtering out what you want is a totally different process. It is leading to a process where g
794.
by 13years 12y ago
I think the fear came about from people being spied on, not from the campaign. And to not fear unchecked, non transparent power is to be a bit naive.
795.
by 13years 12y ago
I hope it works out well. A whole new class of apps and performance might become real. I just wonder how well text performance will be. Would be awesome to get near native speed with editors like Brackets and Atom.
796.
by 13years 12y ago
There is also Tabris.js
797.
by 13years 12y ago
I keep trying Atom, but performance is killing it. Especially multiple cursor support. If you try changing a token that appears several hundred times, pretty much impossible. In brackets, it is painfully useable doing the same, but in sub
798.
Brackets editor 1.2 released(github.com)
23 points by 13years 12y ago|11 comments
799.
by 13years 12y ago
ST is faster and if you want the fastest it is probably slickedit. However, just pointing out Atom could be better than what it is. Multi cursor editing in Atom absolutely can crawl. In brackets it is much more usuable. Everyone says it i
800.
by 13years 12y ago
It seems to be mostly an Atom problem. Brackets and Lighttable built on same technology are way faster.
801.
by 13years 12y ago
Countless studies are flawed. There is even the study that suggests as many as 50% of all studies are wrong, including those that are well designed. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn7915-most-scientific-p... Its
802.
by 13years 12y ago
It is all a matter of whether you want to personally feel superior like you are crushing an argument to onlookers or do you want to make a difference in the world by engaging in a conversation in which people will more likely be receptive t
803.
by 13years 12y ago
Then great, this is the proper next step, I wasn't positioning it as a document of truth, but an example of what 'appears' to be credible. Invite discussion. I wouldn't reply that "you cited a crap paper". H
804.
by 13years 12y ago
Yet I did. The link to pubmed. I mean I'm not here to try to convince you of their argument. However, the 1 pubmed article I referenced mentioned there are over 165 studies supporting issues with mercury in vaccines. Is this not inte
805.
by 13years 12y ago
Actually if you had followed the link, there are over 165 other studies asserting issues with mercury in vaccines. If you go to sciencedaily you can find plenty of studies that raise many questions about the nature of climate change. An int
806.
by 13years 12y ago
"But I can't "realize it is supported by real data" when it clearly is not" But this is somewhat my point. When you say "clearly is not", have you really tried to find it? or assume it is not there. You
807.
by 13years 12y ago
The U.S. National Vaccine Injury Act is the mechanism in place which protects producers from a litigation. So yes, this would be the role of the FDA. However, the effectiveness and willingness of the FDA to take such action, not just again
808.
by 13years 12y ago
And why do people think they are unsafe if they are safe? Where is the disconnect? If I have immunity from all crimes, would you trust me to never commit a crime? Certainly you can see the argument that is proposed is one of trust. Mayb
809.
by 13years 12y ago
So, you mean you have never seen an argument with data? or you didn't believe the data was real? I mean, most people just don't take time to post all the evidence they have acquired in short posts. You post all of these are false,
810.
by 13years 12y ago
Yet one of the issues presented from the anti-vax argument is that there are safety issues with vaccines. The companies producing them are protected by law from the consumer if there are any damages. In a free market, the manufactures woul

More ›