3 ms·
Sure, and the method by which government makes decisions certainly is not the scientific method and should not weigh in on such matters. But still, even if you
by 13years 11y ago
Sure, and the method by which government makes decisions certainly is not the scientific method and should not weigh in on such matters.
But still, even if you constrain yourself to such a definition of what is right, in reality you still may be wrong.
For example:
https://www.sciencenews.org/article/odds-are-its-wrong https://www.sciencenews.org/article/odds-are-its-wrong
and
https://plus.google.com/+ChrisReeveOnlineScientificDiscourseIsBroken/posts/FAxVc3coJVJ?pid=6096228074938200130&oid=108466508041843226480 https://plus.google.com/+ChrisReeveOnlineScientificDiscourse...
and
http://www.vox.com/2015/5/13/8591837/how-science-is-broken http://www.vox.com/2015/5/13/8591837/how-science-is-broken
- pvaldes 11y agoHilarious links. I'm pretty sure that neither "Tatties last trendings: tasty scran or cancerous shite? nor "10 things that doctors don't want you to know about wrinkles" are or will be in the curriculum of the scottish students, never, ever... You can trust me with this.
- 13years 11y agohuh? Hilarious response. Was that even suppose to be a reply to this thread?