112233

10 ms·

121.
Extended Rigid Bodies(puzzlescript.net)
4 points by 112233 9mo ago|0 comments
122.
by 112233 9mo ago
If function of vibecode is not self-evident, dispose of it. Or, to put it differently, having vibe comment does not free you of responsibility to inspect actual vibe code. If code contradicts comments, LLM is as likely to go by comments. It
123.
by 112233 9mo ago
It was both Opus and Sonnet, actually. You ask it to add some feature, clonky goes // use configuration to support previous database scheme // json_data = parse_blah_scheme_yadda ... You, like, "what ar
124.
by 112233 9mo ago
Ah yes, N2625 "What we think we reserve". Basically any C program containing variable or function "top", "END", "strict", "member" and so on is non-conforming and subject to undefined behavi
125.
by 112233 9mo ago
Meh. No human has written the horrors llm produces. At least I am yet to see codebase like that. Let me attempt a theatrical reenactment: // Use buffer that is large enough to hold any possible value. Avoid using JSON config
126.
by 112233 9mo ago
Thank you for putting it in a much more correct and understandable language than I could. That is exactly what I am talking about: if you call __builtin_malloc (e.g. via macro definition in the libc header), compiler is free to do whatever
127.
by 112233 9mo ago
Forbidding LLM to write comments and docstrings (preferrably enforced by build and commit hook) is one of the best "hacks" for using that thing. LLM cannot help itself but emit poisonous comments.
128.
by 112233 10mo ago
As an example, user kentonv wrote: "I patched the memory allocator used by the Cloudflare Workers runtime to overwrite all memory with a static byte pattern on free". And compiler would, like, "nah, let's leave all that
129.
by 112233 10mo ago
Thanks, I did read it! Things like footnote 236: "This means that an implementation is required to provide an actual function for each library function, even if it also provides a macro for that function", where macro is shown to
130.
by 112233 10mo ago
You are literally scaring me now. I'd understand such things being done when statically linking or running JIT, but for "normal" program which function implementation malloc() will link against is not known during compilation
131.
by 112233 10mo ago
I read the text as saying the object size can be less or equal to returned memory size. Anyway, section 7 is library. As you say, replacing through loading is a common thing to do — surely compiler is not free to simply elide external libra
132.
by 112233 10mo ago
Closest to what you say that I can find is 5.1.2.3 §4 of N3096 In the abstract machine, all expressions are evaluated as specified by the semantics. An actual implementation need not evaluate part of an expression if it can deduce
133.
by 112233 10mo ago
Strong disagree. In C, malloc and free are functions, and I expect no magic to happen when calling a function. If malloc and free were keywords like sizeof, it would have been different.
134.
by 112233 10mo ago
Most of C++ programs written before P0593R6 depended on implementation behaviour, and were graciously allowed to not be undefined behaviour just 5 years ago. C++ as a language standard is mostly irrelevant, what one should care about is wh
135.
by 112233 10mo ago
Right? The training set must be insane. The way it heads/tails/greps to limit tokens ingested must have taken a lot to train — that's not something one finds on SO
136.
by 112233 10mo ago
Opus 4.5 is much better at finding creative ways to destroy your code and data than Sonnet.
137.
by 112233 10mo ago
Your site is for people familiar with SQLite. Imagine a person, who knows about vtable, wal, vfs, json1, fts5 and even blockcachevfsd, reading your page. It is between AI slop domain parking and a targeted phishing campaign. The first react
138.
by 112233 10mo ago
Glad to hear. For me, the process does not converge — once code gets big enough (it happens fast, claude hates using existing code and writes duplicate logic every oportunity it gets) it starts dealing more damage every turn. At some point,
139.
by 112233 10mo ago
Not many normal people want to install python. Instead, author of the software they are trying to use wants them to install python. So they follow readme, download windows installer as you say, pip this pipx, pipx that conda, conda this req
140.
by 112233 10mo ago
Would be interested to read your findings, please do a follow-up!
141.
by 112233 10mo ago
By reading the landing page, I feel vomited on. How is sqlite suddenly an inference engine? Why would I even? What is javascript doing in sqlite? Why any of these things have anything to do with sqlite?
142.
by 112233 10mo ago
Do you have a study we can read and evaluate validity of it's methods? If not, here, I can show you my opinion too!: No, what you said is completely false.
143.
Bignum Bakeoff: The Coding Competition You've Probably Never Heard Of(youtube.com)
2 points by 112233 10mo ago|0 comments
144.
by 112233 10mo ago
As someone from time to time peeking into googology.fandom.com , my favorite big number device probably still is loader.c, simply because of how concrete and unreachable it feels. Too bad most Friedman's work has linkrotted by now...
145.
by 112233 10mo ago
Oh, the defensive programming! That thing must have been trained on job interview code, or some enterprise stuff. Heaps of "improvements" and "corrections" that retry, stub, and simply avoid correctly doing stuff for no
146.
by 112233 10mo ago
But how is the senior engineer to get any work done, if they need to babysit the agent and every two minutes accept/reject it's actions? Genuine question. Letting that thing do "whatever" usually means getting insane mul
147.
by 112233 10mo ago
See 6.2.1 of RFC8881, where NFSv4 ACLs are described. They are quite similar to Windows ACLs. Here is kernel dev telling they are against adding NFSv4 ACL implementation. The relevant RichAcls patch never got merged: https://lkml
148.
by 112233 10mo ago
Some of us can! I certainly enjoy doing it, and according to "man 5 acl" what you assert is completely false. Unless you have a particular commit or document from kernel.org you had in mind?
149.
by 112233 10mo ago
since when?
150.
by 112233 10mo ago
Haha, sure. Sorry, it's not you, it's the ACLs (and me nerves). Have you tried configuring NFSv4 ACLs on Linux? Because kernel devs are against supporting them, you either use some other OS or have all sorts of "fun". Al

More ›