4 ms·
See 6.2.1 of RFC8881, where NFSv4 ACLs are described. They are quite similar to Windows ACLs. Here is kernel dev telling they are against adding NFSv4 ACL impl
by 112233 10mo ago
See 6.2.1 of RFC8881, where NFSv4 ACLs are described. They are quite similar to Windows ACLs.
Here is kernel dev telling they are against adding NFSv4 ACL implementation. The relevant RichAcls patch never got merged: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/15/52 https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/3/15/52
- opello 10mo agohttps://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8881#section-6.2.1 https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8881#section-6.2.1 I see what I misunderstood, even in the presence of an ALLOW entry, a DENY entry would prohibit access. I am familiar with that on the Windows side but haven't really dug into Linux ACLs. The ACCESS CHECK ALGORITHM[1] section of the acl(5) man page was pretty clear, I think. [1] https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/acl.5.html#ACCESS_CHECK_ALGORITHM https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/acl.5.html#ACCESS_CHEC...