0dayz

44 ms·

721.
by 0dayz 4y ago
This has nothing to do with defeatism, OP points out the flaw with idealising regulations willy nilly without having a mechanism to make sure it doesn't get exploited (that mechanism often being the people understanding the issue and t
722.
by 0dayz 4y ago
Nono, sorry if I'm confusing you. The part about "desired" and "undesired" is more from how we within society like to create social constructs which dictates what, why and when something should be acceptable and des
723.
by 0dayz 4y ago
Sure, but my point is that we would still put a "capital" on it, we've done it since well... forever really, you wanna be around that "desirable" person while avoiding the "undesirable" the only thing I th
724.
by 0dayz 4y ago
For your first example it's more a matter of architecture than technology.
725.
by 0dayz 4y ago
I get what most people mean with "post capitalism" but if there's one thing I think that will stay with us humans that has to be the need for capital. We may eliminate the need for food, water and shelter but we will still cr
726.
by 0dayz 4y ago
This has me perplexed, if it has to do with sunlight, wouldn't then Nordic countries have a very high level of shortsightedness?
727.
by 0dayz 4y ago
Ive always been in favor of the idea that only a person(s) can hold said copyright or patent and not the company, instead the company can have a license that protects their specific version of said work.
728.
by 0dayz 4y ago
To be fair, don't know the case, but having gone over the YouTube channel in question, all I can say is don't mix anti corruption with humor if you don't want to give the accused ammo.
729.
by 0dayz 4y ago
It might just be me but I genuinely never liked the by now archaic design, instead it's always been about how the culture and community was very vibrant and different (talking about anime on 4chan vs a dedicated fan forum) each time. I
730.
by 0dayz 4y ago
It's clearly labeled "analysis" not opinion. And why specifically is mbfc laughable authority? From what I gather they seem to do at least a decent job at looking into the media outlet's credibility & political posit
731.
by 0dayz 4y ago
I'm sorry but genuinely don't get what you're trying to say here, is it an insult? A praise?
732.
by 0dayz 4y ago
That sounds more like a red herring, food is not a service, it's a product. Administration bloat is a problem everywhere, however I don't think that is the reason for or against national Healthcare.
733.
by 0dayz 4y ago
I found the site tad bit suspicious when they proclaim they are the "small indie company" doing the good fight multi national companies won't (got nothing against left wing causes but I do think far left is a problem) . Accor
734.
by 0dayz 4y ago
Eh, HN is very much like reddit /r/technology + /r/programming but without fancy editor.
735.
by 0dayz 4y ago
I don't think at the end of the day that the issue is the sustainablility of meat that will be its downfall (with the exception of greed, as you can see already with the big shots in the meat industry trying to lobby away lab grown mea
736.
by 0dayz 4y ago
I would throw in a a spanner here, with snap chat, it technically did become more mainstream, but it has always tried to be a "niche" platform. Today it barely has the same relevance.
737.
by 0dayz 4y ago
I don't thinkit has to be that black and white, KISS in Linux world from my experience has been to see any software that isn't "simple" as bloat, while their software is like a car you only turn left with.
738.
by 0dayz 4y ago
You hit the nail on the head there, I would add that today it's more the KISS crowd throwing a fit. Can't imagine the frustration deva must have.
739.
by 0dayz 5y ago
There are some good points here (stop listening to uptight young women), but you ruin it completely by essentially ending it with a less condescending version of "have sex incel", effectively making the entire comment a very lengt
740.
by 0dayz 5y ago
Right, if you actually want to read my comment instead of doing as you describe the leader, you might see things differently. Because then you'll notice a few things: a its acknowledgement of certain USA war crimes and b that its tong
741.
by 0dayz 5y ago
If so why wasn't Russia sanctioning the USA for iraq? And instead gave them the greenlight?
742.
by 0dayz 5y ago
>when it carried out worse crimes than Russia ie invading Iraq or Vietnam? With the exception of using chemical weapon (agent orange) and napalm, you gonna have to extrapolate and provide source for your claim.
743.
by 0dayz 5y ago
One area I think that this article doesn't touch upon is that with a globalized economy it's a lot harder to have a unified "strong" and "assertive" democracy when we buy oil from Russia and cheap electronics f
744.
by 0dayz 5y ago
I think the point about America ignoring corruption is the most crucial aspect of corruption; the enablers, essentially laws, policy makers or systems that have unintented flaws (loopholes) or intended ones (legal bribery) is a huge part of
745.
by 0dayz 5y ago
This style reminds me of late 90s early 2000th website style with those very overly round corners.
746.
by 0dayz 5y ago
This will a good way to avoid reading tweets from those "communities" that are kinda .
747.
by 0dayz 5y ago
This article resonates really well with my frustration with Windows and oh how I wish I could just switch to Linux, sadly the lack of hardware customization on Linux is still a deal breaker for me. It's strange to me tat the company du
748.
by 0dayz 5y ago
I think the mongodb example is the most "right" in that it's only the service of mongodb that gets cut off. With that said it's a similar "issue" I remember a few years back when there were "anti-fascist&q
749.
by 0dayz 5y ago
I've never heard of this site and I have to say its making me scratch my head, the article/analysis is written in a amateurish way for the expertise it proclaim. With that said, it's 100% certain they won't escalate to n
750.
by 0dayz 5y ago
I really don't get this comment, opioid and serf? I would imagine democratic countries do tell their soldiers what they are fighting against and where otherwise thats a strategic failure.

More ›