09094920394314

4 ms·

1.
by 09094920394314 9y ago
Posting this here, because I realize this poster is literally spreading FUD: you can not be fired for not joining a union in a unionized shop: http://gotfired.com/blog/2016/04/can-i-be-fired-for-not-join...
2.
by 09094920394314 9y ago
So you want to protect your free choice...by taking way the free choice of others to organize? For fear of something which does not happen because there is already a law against it ? http://gotfired.com/blog/2016/
3.
by 09094920394314 9y ago
What exactly is "my attitude" please? And good on you, others will either agree or disagree with you. But I do wonder, why should you be allowed to stop union efforts if others aren't allowed to force you to join? And with wh
4.
by 09094920394314 9y ago
> How about we change the laws so that people who support the union are free to join, and people who DON'T are free to leave? >If unions are so great, then they should stand on their own 2 feet, instead of forcing everyone to joi
5.
by 09094920394314 9y ago
> Just to make clear, I am not on either ones side here. Striking is a right in Italy and Germany, so the employees sure can do it. But the reality is how it is as well :/ I hope I didn't come off as aggressive. While I am very
6.
by 09094920394314 9y ago
It's still FUD, it just means some unions are corrupt. Or maybe more whataboutism. Imagine if we all (and not just the left) talked about companies the same way we talk about unions, using the countless examples of managerial abuse, wa
7.
by 09094920394314 9y ago
Which is why Foodora and Uber are seriously pissed in Germany/UK about the resident Gigsters unionizing (source in german) http://www.zeit.de/karriere/beruf/2017-04/crowdworking-click... As a human who i
8.
by 09094920394314 9y ago
And so will either increase prices or slow down delivery. Also, I don't know wether Italy has sane strike laws or not, but in Germany amazon would not be allowed to just fire the strikers, and there is and was non-negligible PR fallout
9.
by 09094920394314 9y ago
>Pay transparency detrimental to you, as an individual. To live a happy life, you must figure out your own purpose and use your mind to achieve it. Happiness is not the result of income, nor is money required to be happy. Your happiness
10.
by 09094920394314 9y ago
>The problem with pay transparency is not that it doesn't work; the problem is that the entire concept is immoral and evil. How much money you make is, properly, strictly a conversation between the parties in the transaction. so how
11.
by 09094920394314 9y ago
Sounds like the only benefit is keeping A in his delusion, instead of informing him via a competitive market that his skill is not as high as he thought he'd be. Oh, and saving the company money. And making it easier to have private fa
12.
by 09094920394314 9y ago
What you, CGP Grey and other people tend to not say is that this is not a deterministic outcome of democracy at all . Even the second link you posted has some exceptions in the article . The book that the video is based on (the Dictators
13.
by 09094920394314 9y ago
Sure, just give me definition of factually wrong and I'build it for you:) Less snarky: not really
14.
by 09094920394314 9y ago
And lack of neural plasticity And power leakage And overheating And no self repair First and last one are the most pertinent here, but there is probably more I can't think of of the top of my head
15.
by 09094920394314 9y ago
The wikipedia link mainly mentions crypto-methods...how exactly is a non-engineer supposed to end to end verify this? If you use paper ballots you can simply sit down and count...heck not even that basic math if you get creative with sortin
16.
by 09094920394314 9y ago
Not worthless. This has some clear assumptions on what holds. He looks at individuals playing a certain game, with no outside information. What the parent describes is two games: 1. Prisoners dilemma between each "slave" and the
17.
by 09094920394314 9y ago
except around 4 $ in transaction fees