0123456789ABCDE

5 ms·

1.
by 0123456789ABCDE 14d ago
> IRC is not social media. what is it then? specifically: what is the medium in which IRC exists, or operates in? are the people using IRC networking with each other, perhaps socializing?
2.
by 0123456789ABCDE 14d ago
> I skimmed through hoping to see examples of the “aesthetics” […] aesthetics is an umbrella term for the "[…] norms and rules of participation, […] forms of sociality, and […] artistic outputs." — think: sociology, culture
3.
by 0123456789ABCDE 14d ago
that handle shows up in the siteops line of site.nfos/TG-the.gateway.XXXX.XX.00.nfo from warez.scene.nfo.collection.v1.0.24351.shroo.ms.zip ( https://defacto2.net/g/shrooms-ftp )
4.
by 0123456789ABCDE 1mo ago
underlying idea of storing git repositories in object stores is identical to https://github.com/tigrisdata/objgit see: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48661938
5.
by 0123456789ABCDE 1mo ago
okay, ignoring the oxymoron with which you end you comment, what do you think folks plan for when they put on a life jacket to enter a recreational boat?
6.
by 0123456789ABCDE 1mo ago
on the other hand if you all you deliver are half-backed products you're bound to create a lot of grief, and move yourself up the corpo ladder.
7.
by 0123456789ABCDE 2mo ago
you're hung up on "The problem is especially severe in Morocco[…]" but the thread has moved on since the root comment where the author starts with: "The oceans are depleted."
8.
by 0123456789ABCDE 2mo ago
you will note gp did not refer to the deceased as a criminal , nor did they condone their murder , on the contrary.
9.
by 0123456789ABCDE 2mo ago
prolly Engineering Manager
10.
by 0123456789ABCDE 2mo ago
yes, the github contributions heatmap is known to be open for manipulation. folks will use it to draw art by backdating commits. if i have it right, only commits can be manipulated, other contributions should be safe — i don't know w
11.
by 0123456789ABCDE 2mo ago
also helps if you're not betting with your own money
12.
by 0123456789ABCDE 2mo ago
ignoring the TOS angle unsafe code is likely being used as in unsafe rust , which is different from exploit code certainly the wording seems to leave the door open for potentially compromised code as in supply-chain attack credent
13.
by 0123456789ABCDE 2mo ago
> the purpose of the system is what is does
14.
by 0123456789ABCDE 2mo ago
no. neither of the observations gp made is dependent upon the definition of machine , nor is it dependent on the inclusion of the examples you brought up in that definition.
15.
by 0123456789ABCDE 3mo ago
most folks don't even know what bun is the "largest real-world demonstration of Claude's capabilities" is sitting in local repos, built with the daily quota leftovers from corpo accounts
16.
by 0123456789ABCDE 3mo ago
interesting that i already had blocked github.com/davidebeatrici unfortunately i did not add a note at the time
17.
by 0123456789ABCDE 3mo ago
usage credits is also an option, auto-reloads too.
18.
by 0123456789ABCDE 3mo ago
wouldn't that burn the capability rather quickly though?
19.
by 0123456789ABCDE 3mo ago
bribery is illegal; this is not
20.
by 0123456789ABCDE 3mo ago
gartner magic quadrant charts don't break the natural expectation of left-to-right, and bottom-to-top, increasing values, this charts from cursor post do.
21.
by 0123456789ABCDE 3mo ago
gp's argument is that cheapness is a construct, derived from the real, and natural , cost parameter which most people are naturally accustomed to interpreting as increasing from left to right. cheapness would then replace the co
22.
by 0123456789ABCDE 3mo ago
opus@max is on average worst than opux@xhigh for supporting evidence, see first chart here: https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-fable-5-mythos-5
23.
by 0123456789ABCDE 3mo ago
what if a path is never released?
24.
by 0123456789ABCDE 3mo ago
wouldn't it be trivial to match the repo to the user logs?
25.
by 0123456789ABCDE 3mo ago
> That’s totally unrelated. i disagree, but it seems clear, from how you put it, that there's no point explaining the why
26.
by 0123456789ABCDE 3mo ago
excuse me but, is this trivial source you're referring to the url included in the post you're responding to, or did they reverse back to the original intent of keeping refusals quiet?
27.
by 0123456789ABCDE 3mo ago
likely mythos class models at first, but i wouldn't put it past them to expand that to the cyber verification program, or similar
28.
by 0123456789ABCDE 3mo ago
Fable's model card provides the following as a relevant reference https://xcancel.com/ClaudeDevs/status/2064949876463645026
29.
by 0123456789ABCDE 3mo ago
there are two different things — one can be against the idea of copyright property, or just copyright laws as written into the legal system, while holding the expectation these should apply to everyone equally
30.
by 0123456789ABCDE 3mo ago
you're being facetious, but the answer to that is: folks with access to a washing machine and hiking gear

More ›