0123456789ABCDE

5 ms·

31.
by 0123456789ABCDE 4mo ago
hope you feel better knowing your effort, reading and then commenting, is appreciated here, and convinced me to read OP's article. it's short, and raises valid points, but i'm left wondering why your reply is so defensive
32.
by 0123456789ABCDE 4mo ago
… or whatever else you set $EDITOR to
33.
by 0123456789ABCDE 4mo ago
> A license is not a contract. you're right, in case law exchange of considerations matters, and licenses are treated as rights grants. however, civil law does not care about considerations , and use of the object implies consent
34.
by 0123456789ABCDE 4mo ago
apparently not you can wait for a reply from tptacek later in the day, or use the search at the bottom to find previous replies here: https://hn.algolia.com/?query=tptacek%20iq%20test&sort=byDat...
35.
by 0123456789ABCDE 4mo ago
> I also think that there is a modest duty owed to users to explain things. > I fundamentally disagree that maintainers owe users nothing. > I strongly believe that when you create something for people to use that there’s an implic
36.
by 0123456789ABCDE 4mo ago
it would save everyone a lot of hurt feelings, and unexpected surprises, if access to open source software was treated as a privilege, instead of treating it like a right
37.
by 0123456789ABCDE 4mo ago
full-disclosure: i skimmed the wiki on reliance damages , and concluded you're wrong. it goes something like this: reliance damages require you produce a contract, or some other evidence, that demonstrates you were promised some thi
38.
by 0123456789ABCDE 4mo ago
integration with 3rd parties (mcp, skills) worked because there was no way github/jira type services would support >2 integrations any other feature being compatible between harnesses makes transitioning from one to another too ea
39.
by 0123456789ABCDE 4mo ago
fwiw, response headers include: Last-Modified: Fri, 22 May 2026 19:08:09 GMT
40.
by 0123456789ABCDE 4mo ago
i stand corrected, but what was clear to you, obviously was not clear to me.
41.
by 0123456789ABCDE 4mo ago
yes, they do. anyone who's, even slightly, clued into how agents access documentation, has been making changes to their pages. ex: https://searchtxt-web.fly.dev/search?q=aws
42.
by 0123456789ABCDE 4mo ago
> I can definitively say llms.txt is not used by any AI players. https://developers.openai.com/llms.txt https://docs.anthropic.com/llms.txt https://geminicli.com/llms.txt https:&#x2F
43.
by 0123456789ABCDE 4mo ago
https://searchtxt-web.fly.dev
44.
by 0123456789ABCDE 4mo ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betteridge%27s_law_of_headline...
45.
by 0123456789ABCDE 4mo ago
> A bunch of different services on a single status page doesn’t make it a complex system. you're it does not. > Most of these have no relation to each other other than the high level services on the cloud providers. so, some of t
46.
by 0123456789ABCDE 4mo ago
beautiful visualization of "complex systems run in degraded mode" https://how.complexsystems.fail/#5
47.
by 0123456789ABCDE 5mo ago
i wasn't thinking about pen-testing, but vulnerability-research, which seems to match that quote. but, you're right, gp is referring to "security scanning". i just feel like, even then whoever's running the research
48.
by 0123456789ABCDE 5mo ago
it wasn't stolen either. an employee accidentally included a source map file with the release.
49.
by 0123456789ABCDE 5mo ago
why are folks looking at the output of the first pass? my understanding, and experience, is that you 1. run a bunch of sessions with small permutations to create variety , 2. run more sessions dedupe reports into a smaller collections of p
50.
by 0123456789ABCDE 5mo ago
>Is the play to plan/design/architect with a heavier model than delegate structured tasks to these smaller ones? always has been claude code has opusplan — uses opus while in plan mode, switches to sonnet for execution. ht
51.
by 0123456789ABCDE 5mo ago
seems to be a well understood angle inside anthropic — colossus use expands subscriber capacity; training goes to aws/gcp https://x.ai/news/anthropic-compute-partnership https://www.anthropic.com/n
52.
by 0123456789ABCDE 5mo ago
so, your colleagues merge features into `master` locally? no pull-requests, no branch protections for `master`. i mean this works, but you probably need those rails in place.
53.
by 0123456789ABCDE 5mo ago
trying to parse your comment, and the story is only getting more convoluted, the more i reread it. "rebasing 70+ commits from master on top of their branch" is not a real thing like, i want to believe you. it just doesn't wor
54.
by 0123456789ABCDE 5mo ago
look, if you have the kind of bank to pay $1/GB of web pages to get to whatever we're hosting, maybe just send an email to sales so we can give you discount on that.
55.
by 0123456789ABCDE 5mo ago
> This mode is the default since Git 2.0, and is the safest option suited for beginners. the docs checkout, ty
56.
by 0123456789ABCDE 5mo ago
they closed series h, last thursday†. what are you on about? † https://www.anthropic.com/news/series-h
57.
by 0123456789ABCDE 5mo ago
excuse me. what am i being sold, in this so called marketing ?
58.
by 0123456789ABCDE 5mo ago
addendum these are changes tacked to my git config over time. they're the result of working in a constant crunch state, where smooth forward move was more import than the state of the git history you left behind. these options remo
59.
by 0123456789ABCDE 5mo ago
#~/.config/git/config [rerere] enabled = true autoUpdate = true while you're editing git config, consider these: [pull] rebase = true [rebase] autoSquash = true autoStash
60.
by 0123456789ABCDE 5mo ago
you're not required to include code in your repos, some are just a collection of markdown files. those could be considered unsafe, but they're not code . but i think you meant: tag all code repos as unsafe , because you assume a

More ›