4 ms·
git != Github. Github just hosts git repositories. You can use git and not host on Github. They were using git, but hosting the repository on CodePlex.
by Watabou 12y ago
git != Github.
Github just hosts git repositories. You can use git and not host on Github.
They were using git, but hosting the repository on CodePlex.
- thesimon 12y ago>We are moving our code to GitHub as well as switching to use git internally But they were using a different tool internally.
- taspeotis 12y agoProbably TFS, which Microsoft use quite a bit internally [1]. [1] http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2013/08/20/tfs-internal-usage-statistics-1st-half-cy-2013.aspx http://blogs.msdn.com/b/visualstudioalm/archive/2013/08/20/t...
- josteink 12y ago> Probably TFS, which Microsoft use quite a bit internally But seemingly less and less so, especially in the SDK-teams. Which is definitely interesting. If Microsoft's own SDK-developers don't want to use Microsoft's own source-control and ALM-system, but rather prefers Github, what signals does that send? I would sayed mixed at best.
- chii 12y agoit's an open secret that TFS sucks ass. I dont think anything is going to change that attitude - they might as well use something better, and hence the move.
- ethomson 12y agoWell, we use GitHub to host our git repositories for open source and public projects. We use TFS to host our git repositories that are private and closed source. GitHub does a great job hosting open source projects. TFS doesn't. I don't think this is a mixed message, we're using the right git hosting service for the job.
- farresito 12y agoThey were not using git. It clearly says in the text that they are switching to git internally, as well.
- Watabou 12y agoOh, you're right. I saw git files in their repository and assumed they were already using git: https://roslyn.codeplex.com https://roslyn.codeplex.com