4 ms·
The comparison chart and cover photo show other "real watches" like the "Tag Heuer Aquaracer 300M" which costs only.. $2,300 ( http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0055NBV
by nacs 12y ago
The comparison chart and cover photo show other "real watches" like the "Tag Heuer Aquaracer 300M" which costs only.. $2,300 ( http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0055NBVDM http://www.amazon.com/dp/B0055NBVDM ).
Ars Technica reviews are usually good but they couldn't have found a watch that's not 10X the Moto's price to compare aesthetics to?
*Edit: Corrected site name.
- seanmcdirmid 12y agoI think you meant Ars, not Anandtech. As for the comparison, I'm sure that was a bit tongue and cheek. No one buys a > $1k watch for functionality. Anyways, if you ever get a chance to attend Basel World, I highly recommend it.
- jp555 12y agoI think you hit on the key point so many are missing; apparel is rarely about functionality. Technologists understand the comparative value of functionality; they generally do not understand the value of fashion. For example, I see so many techies thinking people are "stupid" to keep buying "shiny Apple stuff". That only shows a shallow understanding of "software is eating the world". People spend WAY more money on apparel than they do tech. The next wave of tech growth is much less about smart refrigerators, and much more about smart socks & belts. Just like everyone wears shoes, EVERYONE is going to have a smartphone, soon. This is a profoundly new thing.
- Cthulhu_ 12y agoYeah, especially given how that one is apparently a pound in weight. How did they even manage that? Fill it with solid iridium?
- sosuke 12y agoThanks for the Basel World link, I hadn't heard of that before but their brand book is really cool. http://media.messe.ch/epaper/BASELWORLD/2014/Baselworld_Brand_Book_2014/index.html http://media.messe.ch/epaper/BASELWORLD/2014/Baselworld_Bran... http://www.baselworld.com/en-US/The-Show/BrandBook2014.aspx http://www.baselworld.com/en-US/The-Show/BrandBook2014.aspx
- seanmcdirmid 12y agoI went there on a whim when I was living in Lausanne. It was crazy: the lowest priced watches on display were around $40K.
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- MBCook 12y agoIt seemed to me like the watches were in there for size comparison. Even on the costs are wildly different, they show that the Motorola isn't outlandishly large or heavy compared to other fashion watches.
- bobbles 12y agoI'm guessing they just used things that they had around, they easily could have compared it to this http://www.amazon.com/Seiko-SKS399-Stainless-Steel-Watch/dp/B00GX7N6OQ/ http://www.amazon.com/Seiko-SKS399-Stainless-Steel-Watch/dp/... which is < $100
- masklinn 12y agoThe comparison was about acceptable diameter, thickness and weight for watches. The price is not relevant to point out that the 360 is within "normal" size parameters, and significantly below the upper bound for weight.