8 ms·
> they're representing hqx deceptively. A big difference in the techniques is that hq4x is a fix-rate upscaling, whereas Microsoft's can handle arbitrary targe
by corysama 13y ago
> they're representing hqx deceptively.
A big difference in the techniques is that hq4x is a fix-rate upscaling, whereas Microsoft's can handle arbitrary target resolutions. At the same rez, they are pretty equivalent. But, MS has the option to go higher. HQ8x has not yet been developed. I doubt that HQ(arbitrary)x is possible without completely changing the algorithm.
- lloeki 13y agoNot just higher, but non integer/power of two.
- scott_karana 13y agoI agree, that's huge advantage. That's why I said it was a deceptive representation, but not an invalid one.