3 ms·
Given that the author of this article is "Schering-Plough Professor in Health Care Regulation and Enforcement", it should be obvious why disruption rhetoric may
by bluekeybox 13y ago
Given that the author of this article is "Schering-Plough Professor in Health Care Regulation and Enforcement", it should be obvious why disruption rhetoric may appear threatening to him.
- brendoncrawford 13y agoAre you suggesting that would weaken his argument?
- bluekeybox 13y agoGiven that the author uses the cui bono argument quite extensively (see, for example, "unfortunately, the “disruptions” pursued by Silicon Valley giants ... often have little to do with challenging the biggest power centers in society. And why would they?"), I see no reason why the same logic can't be applied to his own words.
- Daishiman 13y agoThat does not necessarily invalidate the argument.