3 ms·
It was! There's also lots of gloriously amazing tech that the Microsoft Research division produces. However, from what I can see, for whatever reason, much of
by joshavant 13y ago
It was!
There's also lots of gloriously amazing tech that the Microsoft Research division produces. However, from what I can see, for whatever reason, much of it doesn't see the daylight.
- seanmcdirmid 13y agoMuch research does't see daylight in general. That is the nature of research. Some does make into products, but you'd be hard pressed to trace its path from research to product from the outside.
- i386 13y agoPolitics, from what I've heard. Projects like the KIN where killed off my VPs who were afraid it would compete with their products, like Windows Mobile.
- hga 13y agoFor example, they had to pay a terrible platform tax in making it work with Exchange using buggy supplied code. Given the young consumer market they were targeting, that was stark raving mad.
- MBCook 13y agoAs I remember the KIN was also screwed at the last moment when Verizon decided to abandon it. Not only did they not push it like they had planned, they decided it would count as a smartphone, thus your teenager's new "feature phone+" would cost you $50-$70 a month instead of the $10 or $20 it should have. That put directly in the iPhone price range, and the KIN was never designed to compete with the iPhone or any other real smartphone. Too bad. I heard the sync software for it was actually pretty fantastic.
- hga 13y agoAs I recall Verizon didn't do that out of spite, they did it for a variety of reasons that were pretty much Microsoft related, like it being late and lacking some necessary features. I suspect the ways in which Microsoft screwed over or tried to screw over T-Mobile didn't help,