4 ms·
When institutions behave like this they're not just tarnishing their own image. They're destroying civilization. Got into a debate around here a while back try
by api 13y ago
When institutions behave like this they're not just tarnishing their own image. They're destroying civilization.
Got into a debate around here a while back trying to explain why otherwise-rational people are afraid of GMO foods. This is an example of my point. Things like this erode trust not just in the particular institution in question but of all institutions in our society. At some point many people actually start to assume the worst and flip over into seeing official pronouncements as contrarian indicators: "oh, the paid shills say it's safe and it's produced by a big agribusiness corporation so it must be bad for you..."
Even worse still, we have junk like this:
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=moon-landing-faked-why-people-believe-conspiracy-theories https://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=moon-landi...
I've seen a rash of these articles lately, deconstructing in elaborate detail why people distrust science and officialdom and believe in increasingly outlandish "conspiracy theories." They're all elaborate dances to avoid the obvious issue: trust.
It's almost a kind of blame-the-victim mentality: yes you have been lied to, but you should ignore that. If the fact that you've been treated contemptuously causes you to begin harboring suspicions, it's because you are irrational and stupid. Now shut up and believe what you're told.
No, it's not the victim's fault. It is the authorities' fault. Trust is earned through consistent transparency and honorable behavior. When the institutions of society behave dishonorably and unethically, trust is systematically weakened across the entire society.
Once a person learns that their authorities may well be shills, liars, quacks, fools, or worse, then it becomes increasingly easy to harbor increasingly-damning suspicions about what else "they" might be lying about. Hence 9/11 was an inside job, moon hoax, and other conspiracy theories.
Keep in mind that sometimes such suspicions are correct. The executive branch lied the US into war in Iraq, to give one example. With examples of that magnitude, I personally question whether belief in outlandish conspiracy theories is even particularly irrational.
And it's very, very dangerous. Trust is one of the key differences between the first world and the third world. Part of why places like sub-Saharan Africa can never develop is that nobody trusts anyone and nobody dares do anything. They "know" (and sometimes with good reason) that anything they do will simply be stolen by their kleptocracies, and that anything their authorities say is probably a lie. (Hence the prevalence of things like HIV/AIDS denialism in those cultures... another symptom of decayed trust.)
If our leaders, authorities, and institutions continue to treat the public with dismissive contempt, the third world is where we are headed. The prevalence of conspiracy theories and alt-health fearmongering is a leading indicator of an overall breakdown in the implicit trust relationships and social contract that underlies advanced Western societies.
- pnathan 13y agoLooking over things like MKULTRA and the list of problematic experiments that have been committed in the name of science, it is easy to grasp why conspiracy theories form.
- api 13y agoYeah, at least we have IRBs today. The mid-20th century was an ugly time for that kind of thing: MKUltra, syphillis experiments, "here guys, look at the atomic blast, it's pretty!", and so on...
- moultano 13y agoThe next question then is how you construct the power and communication structures within an organization to make it trustworthy.
- awakeasleep 13y agoIf you're interested, Machiavelli's "Discourses on Livy" is a good place to start. He explores the institutions within different societies that allowed them to grow and develop trust. It's one the first book in history that I'm aware of that explored the idea of societal checks and balances, and how the non-enlightened self interest of a group of people can be healthy when its functions are tempered by the self interest of different groups with different agendas. I think that idea is still fresh, and people don't play around with it enough.
- Dylan16807 13y agoI don't care how little trust you have, it's stubborn and wrongheaded to believe in hideously impractical conspiracies. Just because 'they' don't tell you the truth doesn't give them magical powers.
- api 13y agoI agree, and that's why I don't believe in them. But consider this: The reason I don't think 9/11 was an inside job isn't that I don't think there are people in Washington or in -- say -- the defense industry who would do such a thing. There surely are. I don't think it was an inside job because I doubt there are enough of such people or that they are cooperative or competent enough to pull of something of that magnitude and audacity. But yeah, I think there are people who'd do it. Consider how ugly a statement that is about our leaders. We have a problem.