3 ms·
Interesting to see what they got out of basically the same camera sensor. It seems largely just like way better denoising capabilities. Maybe that is why they n
by sharktheone 12d ago
Interesting to see what they got out of basically the same camera sensor. It seems largely just like way better denoising capabilities. Maybe that is why they needed the extra NPU in the A20 chip.
But even with that they are still behind Android phones, while they dominated some years ago
- iririririr 12d agountil the "denoiser" starts to hallucinate
- LoganDark 12d agoAt least it doesn't detect moon shaped objects and impose a static image of the moon on top of it
- matwood 12d ago> But even with that they are still behind Android phones, while they dominated some years ago Flagship Android and iOS device cameras have been 1a/1b for awhile. It's video where Apple dominated. Did Android make some huge strides in video lately?
- torben-friis 12d agoAnecdotically, my current OPPO find x9 mops the floor with my previous iphone 16 pro in photography in practice. The 1-1 with apple only seems to be there for Google and Samsung, but the Chinese flagships are a step up. For video I think the iphone hasn't been dethroned yet.
- eightysixfour 12d agoWouldn’t that comparison be quite a bit closer vs the 17 Pro? I thought that was a decent camera upgrade year but I can’t keep track.
- torben-friis 12d agoGenerationally yes, the oppo is more recent, but (AFAIR, I'm speaking from memory) the 17 improved just on the selfie and accesory lenses, the main camera remained mostly untouched.
- Melatonic 11d agoProRes is great but my many years old LG V60 will shoot real 8K video
- SirMaster 11d agoAnd how will consumers watch back 8K video?
- microtonal 12d agoIt seems that in their ranking currently only the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra is ahead? https://www.dxomark.com/smartphones/#sort-camera https://www.dxomark.com/smartphones/#sort-camera
- makeitdouble 12d agoThe criteria can be pretty weird. For instance th Xiaomi Ultra 17's main camera is faulted for having shallow depth of field or "autofocus decision errors", which I assume just means the auto selected subject wasn't the person straight in front of the camera ? [0] These tests seem to be about versatility and predictability more than sheer performance. [0] https://www.dxomark.com/xiaomi-17-ultra-camera-test/ https://www.dxomark.com/xiaomi-17-ultra-camera-test/
- kemayo 11d agoWow, with a lens that big on a smartphone I'd certainly hope it was fantastic: https://www.dxomark.com/smartphones/Huawei/Pura-80-Ultra https://www.dxomark.com/smartphones/Huawei/Pura-80-Ultra
- killingtime74 11d agoThe lens is big but the phone is still the same size.
- no-name-here 11d agoEven more extreme looking: * https://www.urbanmag-online.com/marques-brownlee-the-worlds-largest-smartphone-camera/ https://www.urbanmag-online.com/marques-brownlee-the-worlds-... * https://www.forbes.com/sites/moorinsights/2024/07/18/vivo-x100-pro-review-great-performance-and-photos-not-great-software/ https://www.forbes.com/sites/moorinsights/2024/07/18/vivo-x1...
- Defolter 11d agoIndeed, Huawei has very aggressive "AI" post-processing
- toephu2 11d agoWhich sensor would that be? I think Sony's?