3 ms·
It reads as impressive defense. Meaning that it's presumably not possible to get root with physical access on a live 50$ device without 250k capital
by TZubiri 2mo ago
It reads as impressive defense. Meaning that it's presumably not possible to get root with physical access on a live 50$ device without 250k capital
- Rohansi 2mo agoThis is for a $1 microcontroller. I'm assuming you're talking about the Raspberry Pi computers based on the $50 cost and root.
- crote 2mo agoIt's a $1 MCU, which will get embedded into a $50 device. If you're a company selling a cloud-plus-device product, then that 250k tooling cost and not-exactly-trivial attack process will be quite effective at stopping Chinese clones: with a unique per-device key there's no way they'll sell enough units to make a profit before you will inevitably ban their cloned key.
- TZubiri 2mo agoWell not chinese clones, those are well funded factories with state su subsidies, but it will definitely stop rogue individual hackers. It's not even 250k cost, just 250k capital, it can be rented.