3 ms·

Why was this post flagged? This site has become ridiculous, people are routinely abusing the flagging system to take down posts they don’t like even if they’re

Why was this post flagged? This site has become ridiculous, people are routinely abusing the flagging system to take down posts they don’t like even if they’re obviously on topic and relevant to HN. And it seems like some users have substantially more flagging weight because these posts, likely this one, are often top 5 on HN.

EagnaIonat 18d ago
Probably because the site promotes far-right agendas.
- deleted 18d ago
  [deleted]
maxrev17 19d ago
[flagged]
irregularbowels 19d ago
[dead]
nathan_young 19d ago
Seems like hackernews should use a bridging algorithm for flagging.
surfmike 19d ago
Maybe because the headline is misleading? (because there's no connection to the Hugging Face attack) That said, it's the second day and it's still on the front page.
- magicmicah85 18d ago
  The headline is not misleading, the article actually links to the incident with OpenAI and Irregular which is here: https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-involving-openai-models/ https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-invol...
  - hn_throwaway_99 18d ago
    It is misleading, even if it's true. The headline states "A single firm is behind OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta hacking scandals". Given that Hugging Face was the most prominent hacking scandal, it would be reasonable to think that that's one of the scandals they're talking about. But more to the point, the article is trying to paint this as some sort of coordinated plan just because there was a sandbox misconfiguration by Irregular. The fact that the most well known hacking scandal was due to a completely unrelated escape (zero day in Artifactory) makes the entire thesis of the article invalid.
- glenstein 18d ago
  Maybe the title was changed, but the current title does not reference a Hugging Face attack.
  - Ydarbleoj 18d ago
    After reading the article, the title doesn't seem all that off and definitely nothing to be a pedant about.
- an0malous 18d ago
  Which part of the headline is misleading? It is factually correct that Irregular was involved in incidents with all three AI labs. It must have been reinstated because it was off the front page for a full day and suddenly back up in the last hour.
  - cubefox 18d ago
    It is strongly misleading because it says "behind hacking scandals" (which suggests behind all of them in general) not "behind some of the hacking scandals". Considering that by far the most important one, the Hugging Face hack, has no Irregular involvement, the headline is deceptive.
rezonant 19d ago
What's ridiculous is the constant complaints about flagging and downvoting. It's bad form. If you think something was flagged when it shouldn't have been, vouch for it. Seems like people who complain are unaware that anyone with a modicum of karma can flag and down vote.
- ggsgwgw 18d ago
  [dead]
lkbm 18d ago
I'm confused by the headline being a headline here at all. Irregular being involved in OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta incidents has been well-known for over a month[0][1]. It's literally the only thing I know about the Meta incident. [0] https://x.com/jtcbrule/status/2085443180191715780 https://x.com/jtcbrule/status/2085443180191715780 [1] https://x.com/RaconteurR2D2/status/2086932963829125185 https://x.com/RaconteurR2D2/status/2086932963829125185
- itemize123 18d ago
  if you are reading the comments - it's news to a lot of less-wired-in persons (like most of us)
  - lkbm 18d ago
    Fair, "widely known" might be exaggerating, but I'm confused as to why it's news now. Is there anything new, or is it just a legible summary just came out?

EagnaIonat 18d ago

Probably because the site promotes far-right agendas.

deleted 18d ago
[deleted]

maxrev17 19d ago

[flagged]

irregularbowels 19d ago

[dead]

nathan_young 19d ago

Seems like hackernews should use a bridging algorithm for flagging.

surfmike 19d ago

Maybe because the headline is misleading? (because there's no connection to the Hugging Face attack) That said, it's the second day and it's still on the front page.

magicmicah85 18d ago
The headline is not misleading, the article actually links to the incident with OpenAI and Irregular which is here: https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-involving-openai-models/ https://openai.com/index/third-party-cyber-evaluations-invol...
- hn_throwaway_99 18d ago
  It is misleading, even if it's true. The headline states "A single firm is behind OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta hacking scandals". Given that Hugging Face was the most prominent hacking scandal, it would be reasonable to think that that's one of the scandals they're talking about. But more to the point, the article is trying to paint this as some sort of coordinated plan just because there was a sandbox misconfiguration by Irregular. The fact that the most well known hacking scandal was due to a completely unrelated escape (zero day in Artifactory) makes the entire thesis of the article invalid.
glenstein 18d ago
Maybe the title was changed, but the current title does not reference a Hugging Face attack.
- Ydarbleoj 18d ago
  After reading the article, the title doesn't seem all that off and definitely nothing to be a pedant about.
an0malous 18d ago
Which part of the headline is misleading? It is factually correct that Irregular was involved in incidents with all three AI labs. It must have been reinstated because it was off the front page for a full day and suddenly back up in the last hour.
- cubefox 18d ago
  It is strongly misleading because it says "behind hacking scandals" (which suggests behind all of them in general) not "behind some of the hacking scandals". Considering that by far the most important one, the Hugging Face hack, has no Irregular involvement, the headline is deceptive.

rezonant 19d ago

What's ridiculous is the constant complaints about flagging and downvoting. It's bad form. If you think something was flagged when it shouldn't have been, vouch for it. Seems like people who complain are unaware that anyone with a modicum of karma can flag and down vote.

ggsgwgw 18d ago
[dead]

lkbm 18d ago

I'm confused by the headline being a headline here at all. Irregular being involved in OpenAI, Anthropic, and Meta incidents has been well-known for over a month[0][1]. It's literally the only thing I know about the Meta incident. [0] https://x.com/jtcbrule/status/2085443180191715780 https://x.com/jtcbrule/status/2085443180191715780 [1] https://x.com/RaconteurR2D2/status/2086932963829125185 https://x.com/RaconteurR2D2/status/2086932963829125185

itemize123 18d ago
if you are reading the comments - it's news to a lot of less-wired-in persons (like most of us)
- lkbm 18d ago
  Fair, "widely known" might be exaggerating, but I'm confused as to why it's news now. Is there anything new, or is it just a legible summary just came out?