Ydarbleoj

4 ms·

1.
by Ydarbleoj 8d ago
> reified intelligence on a chip almost too cheap to meter, available to everyone across the world - not just rich West. I think this is quite the pollyannaish perspective and very much inline with those that think if you can take, then
2.
by Ydarbleoj 11d ago
After reading the article, the title doesn't seem all that off and definitely nothing to be a pedant about.
3.
by Ydarbleoj 12d ago
I was lumping Anthropic in there with OpenAI but I didn't know about Alibaba (or Google and Deepseek for that matter). So it would appear poor security for one.
4.
by Ydarbleoj 12d ago
I wonder why we don't hear of other frontier labs experiencing these "break outs". Is it that they're orchestrated? Do these labs lack fundamental safety guidelines in their sandboxes as opposed to their peers? Is it ano
5.
by Ydarbleoj 14d ago
I get it. I do. I just believe we live in a world where our corporate leaders speak out of both sides of their mouths. And typically, people who get to these positions are not the Jacob Coxon's of the world. That is to say, I've b
6.
by Ydarbleoj 14d ago
Because I find the cognitive dissonance of saying it's dangerous while flying as fast as possible to an IPO too much to take. I just don't understand how others parse this differently.
7.
by Ydarbleoj 14d ago
The more he talks the less seriously I take him.
8.
by Ydarbleoj 14d ago
He talks too much and as a result it's looked like pre-IPO hype and disingenuous because if he believed what he says then he'd stop. Now, someone is going to say but the investors and obligation to be first; and I would say exactl
9.
by Ydarbleoj 14d ago
Totally, but I didn't say political means everything I said everything is political, which means anything a human does to any extent, tacitly or otherwise, is embedded in a power structure.
10.
by Ydarbleoj 15d ago
What you're suggesting is that it's a spectrum and I agree. I don't know what to tell you.
11.
by Ydarbleoj 15d ago
Just to be clear, everything is political - whether you want to acknowledge it or not.
12.
by Ydarbleoj 15d ago
Whoa. That's not at all what they said and shows you lack intellectual honesty.
13.
by Ydarbleoj 16d ago
Sounds less stressful.
14.
by Ydarbleoj 16d ago
That's what a lot of American companies say. Wait until you hear about Amazon's practices.
15.
by Ydarbleoj 16d ago
The one that requires full-attention from the driver? No.
16.
by Ydarbleoj 16d ago
Sorry, but the notion that creative writing and robotaxi's exist as proof of anything is like saying my child can drive and write; and while true, the measure of that ability is not at the level of the best humans. It's average at
17.
by Ydarbleoj 16d ago
Delivers an ungodly amount of space pollution that's for sure.
18.
by Ydarbleoj 16d ago
It’s not about what they say but what they do and right now no frontier AI company deserves anything but skepticism based on how they act verse what they say.
19.
by Ydarbleoj 16d ago
This is a reminder based on believing what these companies say. I’ve lived long enough to know what they say and what they do are often quite different; and it is not our job to trust but to verify.
20.
by Ydarbleoj 18d ago
Yes.
21.
by Ydarbleoj 18d ago
We should absolutely be able to see inside of our prisons. What are they hiding (My expectation is that we treat people humanely. You can tell a lot about a society by how they treat their prisoners)?
22.
by Ydarbleoj 18d ago
I think this is a good point. My only push back would be that when people say they have ADHD, in my experience, they're speaking about inattention (and yes, it's one of the big factors). And while I don't love that aspect in
23.
by Ydarbleoj 18d ago
> At 11:58 P.M. EDT on Monday, Buckmaster posted his and Alpöge’s results, along with the statement laying out his account of events. According to the statement, he does not know how the OpenAI team so quickly reconstructed the details o
24.
by Ydarbleoj 23d ago
I don't get this take. I feel like this area is feeling much of what we're seeing in many major cities (SF being the most expensive in the country); locals priced out of starting store front businesses due to high commercial rents
25.
by Ydarbleoj 1mo ago
But that value is subjective. If my tap water is brown as a result of a DC, I may not agree with your positives. If my neighborhood is humming all night because of a DC, again, I might not have the ability to see what you see as positive. S
26.
by Ydarbleoj 1mo ago
Let's say a DC is being built in my area and I read how in some locations tap water is being polluted by these DCs. Wouldn't it be better to address that before it's built rather than after?
27.
by Ydarbleoj 1mo ago
These comments are full of the "but you participate in society" fallacy. Data centers can do a thing positively and yet have negative impacts that should be discussed. It's not that hard.
28.
by Ydarbleoj 1mo ago
You are engaging in the "but you participate in society" fallacy. One can critique systems they are still interacting with, to suggest otherwise is just so incredibly lazy.
29.
by Ydarbleoj 1mo ago
Assault is doing some heavy lifting here for the sensitive crowd.
30.
by Ydarbleoj 1mo ago
So if someone critiques LE they’re leftist? That’s pretty lazy and definitely indicative of someone in a silo.

More ›