4 ms·

This makes about as much sense to me as banning all personal computers in the eighties from schools. You are putting these kids at a decided disadvantage.

by rmason 23d ago

dymk 23d ago
Kids can play on slot machines when they’re older. An 8 year old doesn’t need Claude.
protimewaster 23d ago
It's limited to "younger students", and keeping younger students away from computers also isn't a bad idea IMO.
- hgoel 23d ago
  Keeping younger students away from computers is dumb, but we do need to go back to the basic computer literacy classes of the early/mid 2000s, e.g. typing, basics of desktop operating systems like the filesystem, using word, powerpoint etc. It's appalling how lacking high schoolers seem to be in these kinds of skills.
  - esalman 23d ago
    > Keeping younger students away from computers is dumb No. There's proven research that shows reading a book or writing with a pen or pencil is much more stimulating and beneficial compared to looking at a screen or tapping/typing on it.
    - hgoel 22d ago
      But they also need to have computer skills if they're going to survive in this world... it's too late to teach them once they're old enough to have the safeguards removed.
      - esalman 22d ago
        If you let them develop critical thinking skills, it'll actually be easier to reach them.
        hgoel 19d ago
        Yeah, I suppose we should hold off on teaching them everything that isn't critical thinking, lest they develop skills other than what is deemed acceptable by people like you. Maybe we should have them live in 15th century lifestyle towns! Wouldn't want them having any contact with this awful world!
- anonymars 23d ago
  I think young exposure to real computers (where you create, and have to figure things out; not consumption machines) provides access to a level of fluency that is otherwise difficult or impossible to achieve, just like many other skills (language, music...)
  - protimewaster 23d ago
    I think that can be done without having them sit in front of a computer or even really using a computer, though. Lots of kids have stories about wandering over to a college campus when they were in middle school, wandering into a room with the keypunch machines, and learning about computers that way. Very few of those kids directly used a computer, but they learned it anyway.
    - anonymars 23d ago
      How prevalent do you think are children that live within wandering distance of a college that lets random children enter and use their computers?
      - protimewaster 22d ago
        Colleges with key punches? Probably pretty close to zero. My point was more that, I think it's incorrect to assert that it's necessary for kids to directly use a computer in order to effectively learn about them. We have tons of concrete evidence of kids learning to be excellent at programming and understanding computers without directly using one. It happened with the kids I described.
  - SoftTalker 23d ago
    So give your kid an Apple-II or TRS-80 then?
  - orwin 23d ago
    I'm pretty sure we ran these experiments in France in the late 80s/early 90s, it was pretty clear that exposure to real computers was useless in elementary school, and even in middle school technology teachers weren't a big fans of teaching computer skills before 14 (basically around the same time as they taught tin soldering).
GlacierFox 23d ago
[flagged]
- kolinko 23d ago
  Current chatbots are better tutors than an average school teacher imho. Not saying that we should replace ones with the other ones, but I’d say from age 11-12 and up kids should be taught how to use AI well.
  - nekiwo 23d ago
    Communicating with adults and handling the friction of conversing with others is a skill students need to gain, especially at this age. Talking to a machine that will always suit your style of talking isn't always good.
    - jjk166 23d ago
      The purpose of a teacher is not to be a challenging conversational partner.
  - azuanrb 23d ago
    Sure, if the kids want to learn. But let’s be honest, most of them, or even us, are just going to use the chatbot directly for the answer.
    - jjk166 23d ago
      If the kids don't want to learn, and the schools aren't looking for anything beyond their ability to produce an answer, that's not an AI problem.
  - lkey 23d ago
    There is significant evidence against this, and very little for it beyond your 'honest opinion'. A recent study showed just 2 out of tens of thousands of children in China improved their performance after beginning to use AI assistance. People will take the shortcut in front of them, absent enforcement, and this is how it works in work and in school. Putting it onto any individual to 'use it well' is to misunderstand the system that is being constructed.
boredpeter 23d ago
[dead]
jansport123 23d ago
i wouldn't let my kid use a phone or a computer till a certain age. age 1 - 11 is about having strong foundations in basics and these basics haven't really changed in a couple of decades at least. Reading, critical thinking, math etc... all don't need computers to a certain age. I say this as someone who got on a pc at age 10 and have made a living off being interested in computers.

This makes about as much sense to me as banning all personal computers in the eighties from schools. You are putting these kids at a decided disadvantage.

by rmason 23d ago

This makes about as much sense to me as banning all personal computers in the eighties from schools. You are putting these kids at a decided disadvantage.

dymk 23d ago

Kids can play on slot machines when they’re older. An 8 year old doesn’t need Claude.

protimewaster 23d ago

It's limited to "younger students", and keeping younger students away from computers also isn't a bad idea IMO.

hgoel 23d ago
Keeping younger students away from computers is dumb, but we do need to go back to the basic computer literacy classes of the early/mid 2000s, e.g. typing, basics of desktop operating systems like the filesystem, using word, powerpoint etc. It's appalling how lacking high schoolers seem to be in these kinds of skills.
- esalman 23d ago
  > Keeping younger students away from computers is dumb No. There's proven research that shows reading a book or writing with a pen or pencil is much more stimulating and beneficial compared to looking at a screen or tapping/typing on it.
  - hgoel 22d ago
    But they also need to have computer skills if they're going to survive in this world... it's too late to teach them once they're old enough to have the safeguards removed.
    - esalman 22d ago
      If you let them develop critical thinking skills, it'll actually be easier to reach them.
      - hgoel 19d ago
        Yeah, I suppose we should hold off on teaching them everything that isn't critical thinking, lest they develop skills other than what is deemed acceptable by people like you. Maybe we should have them live in 15th century lifestyle towns! Wouldn't want them having any contact with this awful world!
anonymars 23d ago
I think young exposure to real computers (where you create, and have to figure things out; not consumption machines) provides access to a level of fluency that is otherwise difficult or impossible to achieve, just like many other skills (language, music...)
- protimewaster 23d ago
  I think that can be done without having them sit in front of a computer or even really using a computer, though. Lots of kids have stories about wandering over to a college campus when they were in middle school, wandering into a room with the keypunch machines, and learning about computers that way. Very few of those kids directly used a computer, but they learned it anyway.
  - anonymars 23d ago
    How prevalent do you think are children that live within wandering distance of a college that lets random children enter and use their computers?
    - protimewaster 22d ago
      Colleges with key punches? Probably pretty close to zero. My point was more that, I think it's incorrect to assert that it's necessary for kids to directly use a computer in order to effectively learn about them. We have tons of concrete evidence of kids learning to be excellent at programming and understanding computers without directly using one. It happened with the kids I described.
- SoftTalker 23d ago
  So give your kid an Apple-II or TRS-80 then?
- orwin 23d ago
  I'm pretty sure we ran these experiments in France in the late 80s/early 90s, it was pretty clear that exposure to real computers was useless in elementary school, and even in middle school technology teachers weren't a big fans of teaching computer skills before 14 (basically around the same time as they taught tin soldering).

GlacierFox 23d ago

[flagged]

kolinko 23d ago
Current chatbots are better tutors than an average school teacher imho. Not saying that we should replace ones with the other ones, but I’d say from age 11-12 and up kids should be taught how to use AI well.
- nekiwo 23d ago
  Communicating with adults and handling the friction of conversing with others is a skill students need to gain, especially at this age. Talking to a machine that will always suit your style of talking isn't always good.
  - jjk166 23d ago
    The purpose of a teacher is not to be a challenging conversational partner.
- azuanrb 23d ago
  Sure, if the kids want to learn. But let’s be honest, most of them, or even us, are just going to use the chatbot directly for the answer.
  - jjk166 23d ago
    If the kids don't want to learn, and the schools aren't looking for anything beyond their ability to produce an answer, that's not an AI problem.
- lkey 23d ago
  There is significant evidence against this, and very little for it beyond your 'honest opinion'. A recent study showed just 2 out of tens of thousands of children in China improved their performance after beginning to use AI assistance. People will take the shortcut in front of them, absent enforcement, and this is how it works in work and in school. Putting it onto any individual to 'use it well' is to misunderstand the system that is being constructed.

boredpeter 23d ago

[dead]

jansport123 23d ago

i wouldn't let my kid use a phone or a computer till a certain age. age 1 - 11 is about having strong foundations in basics and these basics haven't really changed in a couple of decades at least. Reading, critical thinking, math etc... all don't need computers to a certain age. I say this as someone who got on a pc at age 10 and have made a living off being interested in computers.