3 ms·
> It's still better than nothing. Once again the alternative is not nothing. The most important factor is that they are stakeholders in a project with influenc
by groundzeros2015 2mo ago
> It's still better than nothing.
Once again the alternative is not nothing. The most important factor is that they are stakeholders in a project with influence. That is the reality right now, even without credentials.
- disgruntledphd2 2mo ago> Once again the alternative is not nothing. Can you help me understand what the alternative is?
- groundzeros2015 2mo agoYes the framing above is “business people don’t listen to engineers but if they had a credential they would legally be forced to”. And I think both are false. The top engineers on a project are collaborators with leaders in other areas like marketing, sales, IT, legal, etc. And all those have influence on a project. A business person who says “fuck what my engineer says” is not a good leader and won’t have that group’s trust or support. They all want to work together. So by that process engineering has a seat of influence. That exists without credentials, and credentials are not what gets you in that seat. Reputation and experience are. Business leaders don’t do everything engineering says. They also don’t do everything the lawyers say! And having an additional legal backing would change some of these engineering conversation, but not fundamentally.