2 ms·
Why would you need a guide for that now? We long had to pick different models (and thinking levels) by task and feel.
by jstummbillig 3mo ago
Why would you need a guide for that now? We long had to pick different models (and thinking levels) by task and feel.
- Jcampuzano2 3mo agoPreviously it was much more obvious which model to reach for depending on your use case because they had the mini and nano naming conventions. Getting rid of that seems like a step back. Just a personal nit though. I've seen buzz about this elsewhere as well but to me effort levels seem more like spend limits disguised with another word. I don't think they should even exist.
- bigyabai 3mo agoThe naming convention is bizarre and doesn't really mean anything to normies. Trying to pick between "Sol" and "Terra" is like asking the average person if they want the Max or the Ultra chip.
- copperx 3mo agoBizarre? The size of the model is in the name. Sun, earth, and moon don't mean anything?
- slekker 3mo agoThe sun is bigger than earth which is bigger than the moon, it's pretty simple really
- bigyabai 3mo agoWhich is cheaper to use? The size euphemism is a really roundabout description vs "Nano" and "Pro" for the layperson.
- minimaxir 3mo agoWhat about Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus?
- dawnerd 3mo agoAlso just as confusing. Shouldn’t take away from the point though. Both can be bad names.
- aerhardt 3mo agoMy guide was to pick the best model on "High" for 99% of tasks.