copperx

3 ms·

1.
by copperx 5d ago
An LLM, of course.
2.
by copperx 7d ago
Ant tips for doing so? I've never been able to do that, even as a kid. I remember the meaning but not the exact words.
3.
by copperx 7d ago
Oh, you could.
4.
by copperx 8d ago
I'd sell half kidney for a reboot of SV, in its AI edition.
5.
by copperx 9d ago
craic? really?
6.
by copperx 9d ago
"Just Jeeves".
7.
by copperx 9d ago
Most likely trolling. No one is that naive.
8.
by copperx 9d ago
I'd love to live in your fantasy world.
9.
by copperx 10d ago
OMP and DS are a match made in heaven.
10.
by copperx 10d ago
Are you using the API directly from Deepseek? Otherwise, performance will suffer greatly. If you're using OpenRouter make sure to pin Deepseek as the provider. If you're using OpenCode Go who knows who the provider is.
11.
by copperx 10d ago
They said that it works with up to 255 options.
12.
by copperx 10d ago
This ought to work better than SpamAssassin, I'm sure
13.
by copperx 10d ago
Feed the generated note back into the input for the next query and you have ... autoregression?
14.
by copperx 10d ago
Not hallucinating is easy when you don't produce strings.
15.
by copperx 10d ago
Non-hallucinated ones at that.
16.
by copperx 10d ago
I'm sure you've thought of self-driving. How does the model work in that space?
17.
by copperx 10d ago
Shouldn't self-driving be a piece of cake if it works this well for Doom? Or what am I missing?
18.
by copperx 10d ago
Um, Isn't SELF DRIVING the elephant in the room?
19.
by copperx 11d ago
Yup. Reality is full of special cases.
20.
by copperx 12d ago
Most of us are struggling? That's some deluded talk. No one can explain the chain of actions that would need to happen for extinction to occur, but the fearful say it's "obvious". If you're fearful, can you elucidat
21.
by copperx 14d ago
But how are they going to fix the hug?
22.
by copperx 15d ago
What bug?
23.
by copperx 15d ago
AI is reaching religious levels of fanaticism, which I find highly disturbing.
24.
by copperx 15d ago
I guess we'll see, but odds are that reality will reel you back in.
25.
by copperx 15d ago
LLMs are incredibly good at handling code. But you're extrapolating their capabilities just because their handling of code is so shockingly good (compared to what we had before). I think AGI will be eventually achieved, but it will not
26.
by copperx 15d ago
This is the closest to an admission of failure you'll get from sama.
27.
by copperx 15d ago
Using the same provider?
28.
by copperx 17d ago
> (But my claim was that one need to understand something to write poem about it. And the LLM can write poem about it) I'm sorry, but you're being fooled by the output. A psychopath can feign empathy without ever feeling it; so
29.
by copperx 17d ago
It's either that, or that he drank the Koolaid a long time ago.
30.
by copperx 17d ago
> an extremely capable harness and enough access. Give enough access to a fuzzer and it's exactly as dangerous as an LLM. LLMs don't even have a moat in this domain.

More ›