3 ms·
> But if you assume he's just a villain You don't have to assume anything. A true "good guy" doesn't openly say that he's fine with autonomous, AI-powered weap
by kouteiheika 3mo ago
> But if you assume he's just a villain
You don't have to assume anything. A true "good guy" doesn't openly say that he's fine with autonomous, AI-powered weapons being used against me, and mass surveillance applied to me and my family just because I don't live in the US. A true "good guy" doesn't say "privacy is a human right", and then immediately (and completely) bend the knee to an authoritarian government on this issue.
- user43928 3mo agoOpenAI's agreement with the Pentagon was "No use of OpenAI technology to direct autonomous weapons systems". And about the mass surveillance, I don't see why the military should not use AI to do surveillance abroad.
- chillfox 3mo agoMaybe because it will make people abroad like you less and that has flow-on effects, mostly economic.
- nl 3mo agoI think that applies to military involvement abroad generally. If you are dropping bombs on someone I'm unconvinced the use of AI will make them like you more or less.
- chillfox 3mo agoFor sure, I am assuming they spy on a lot more people than they drop bombs on. I remember a long time ago it came out that the US had been doing mass spying on the Danish people, my dad was very upset about it and disliked the US for the rest of his life. Of course the only thing he did about it was not watch American movies anymore or visit the US. Anyway, I assume it will be a case of a million little paper cuts, each thing putting off a group of people until someday it adds up to real meaningful economic impact.
- layla5alive 3mo agoDo you see a problem with imperialism?